DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20162502

Bupivacaine versus tramadol: a clinical comparison of two anaesthetics administered via epidural route for postoperative analgesic effect in gynaecological surgeries

Md. Arshad Imam, Sabir Hasnat

Abstract


Background: Gynaecological surgeries are associated with significant postoperative pain. The pain is usually of a long duration. Caudal epidural block has been considered as a procedure of choice for pain relief in such cases. This study was conducted to evaluate postoperative analgesic efficacy of four doses of epidurally administered Bupivacaine versus tramadol in gynaecological surgeries.

Methods: 40 adult cases ranging in age from 20 to 60 years with ASA Grade I & II, presenting for elective gynaecological surgery. Cases were randomly allocated into two groups containing 20 cases each. Cases in Group B received 10ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine and those in Group T received Tramadol 100mg in 10ml of normal saline.

Results: Cases in Group T receiving epidural Tramadol had significant lower pain score on VAS as well as during 24 hours of observation. These cases also had significantly longer dosage intervals compared to Group B cases receiving Bupivacaine. Cardiovascular parameters were stable and similar between both groups.

Conclusions: Epidural Tramadol has better postoperative analgesic efficacy than epidural Bupivacaine. It is a potent and effective postoperative analgesic with rapid onset and minimum side effects.


Keywords


Analgesic, Bupivacaine, Gynaecological, Epidural, Postoperative, Tramadol

Full Text:

PDF

References


Farag HM, Esmat IM. Efficacy of two doses of Tramadol versus Bupivacaine in perioperative caudal analgesia in adult hemorrhoidectomy. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016;10:138-42.

Rowney DA, Doyle E. Epidural and subarachnoid blockade in shildren. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:980-1001.

Broadman LM, Hannallah RS. Experience with 1154 consecutive cases without complications. Anaesth Anal. 1987;66:848-54.

Dalens BJ. Regional anaesthesia in children. In: Miller RD, editor. Anaesthesia. 5th ed. Vol 1549. Philadelphia: Chirchill Livingstone; 2000:85.

Krane EJ, Jacobson LE. Caudal morphine for analgesia in children: A comparison with caudal bupivacaine and intravenous morphine. Anaesth Analg. 1987;66:647-53.

Hansen TG, Hennerberg SW, Lund J. Caudal bupivacaine supplemented with caudal or intravenous clonidine in children undergoing hypospadias repair. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:223-7.

Kumar P, Rudra R, Pan AA, Asharia A. Caudal additives in paediatrics: a comparison among midazolam, Ketamine and neostigmine co-administered with bupivacaine. Anaesth Analg. 2005;101:69-73.

Zeidan A, KAssem R, Nahleh N, Maaliki H. Intraarticular Tramadol-Bupivacaine combination prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia after outpatient arthroscopic knee surgery. Anaesth Analg. 2008;107(1):292-9.

Arcioni R, Rocca M, Romano S, Romano R. Ondansetron inhibits the analgesic effects of tramadol: a possible 5HT(3) spinal receptor involvement in acute pain in humans. Anesth Anal. 2002;94:1553-7.

MErt T, Gunyes Y, Guven M, gunay I. Differential effects of lignocaine ad tramadol on modified nerve impulse by 4-aminopyridine in rats. Pharmacology. 2003;69:68-73.

Davidson C, Langford RM. Actions of tramadol, its enantiomere and principal metabolite, O-desmethyltramadol, on serotonine (5-HT) efflux and uptake in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus. Br J Anaesth. 1997;79:352-6.

Kayser V, Besson JM. Evidence for noradrenergic component in the antinociceptive effect of the analgesic agent tramadol I an animal model of clinical pain, the arthritic rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;224:83-8.

Shipton EA. Tramadol: present and future. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;28:363-74.

Okzan S, Pocan S, Bahar A. The effect of caudal bupivacaine versus tramadol in postoperative analgesia for paediatric patients. J Int Med Res. 2003;31:497-502.

Grond S, Sablotzki. Clinical pharmacology of tramadol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43:879-923.