DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20183884

Knowledge, attitude and practice of physicians towards oral anti-coagulants in Taif city, Saudi Arabia

Raghad Alnemari, Ahmed Banheem, Naeem Mullaniazee, Saleh Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed Rajkhan, Omar Basfar, Mohammed Basnawi

Abstract


Background: Thromboembolism is a common phenomenon of major significance. Oral anticoagulants have been used for decades, however, they were associated with many complications and different monitoring techniques. Therefore, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with better efficacy, lower adverse events, superior pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile were developed. Unfortunately, many of the physicians are still hesitant to prescribe these agents.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Taif city on 61 physicians from King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital and King Faisal Hospital in Taif. A questionnaire was given to participants to answer questions related to knowledge, attitude, and practice of prescription of KA and NOACs, indications of prescription, reasons for non-use, follow up methods adopted, follow up frequency, common adverse events encountered, awareness of new guidelines of NOACs, and providing patients with health education about their medications.

Results: Only 69% of participants used NOACs on regular basis, whilst 100% used warfarin. Half of those who didn't prescribe NOACs attributed this to the non-availability of an antidote and fear of toxicity. Twenty-five% considered the NOACs new medications with inadequate clinical trials that make them trustable., and 17% did not prescribe them because of their non-availability at the hospital pharmacy. Only 66% used NOACs in treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Regarding knowledge, 71% of participants were aware of the new guidelines of NOACs, and 69% of institutions provided educational programs about these new agents. Major life-threatening bleeding was reported in 47.3% and 10.8% of patients on warfarin and NOACs, respectively.

Conclusions: Physicians at Taif city in Saudi Arabia had a fairly good knowledge of NOACs. They prescribed them frequently and they were aware with the new guidelines and proper follow-up methods. However, more educational activities are recommended to encourage the rest of physician to use these agents and to correct their defective information about safety issues, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of NOACs, and adverse events.


Keywords


Attitude, Knowledge, Oral anticoagulants, NOACs, Practice, Warfarin

Full Text:

PDF

References


Franchini M, Liumbruno GM, Bonfanti C, Lippi G. The evolution of anticoagulant therapy. Blood Transfusion. 2016 Mar;14(2):175.

Mekaj YH, Mekaj AY, Duci SB, Miftari EI. New oral anticoagulants: their advantages and disadvantages compared with vitamin K antagonists in the prevention and treatment of patients with thromboembolic events. Therapeutics Clin Risk Management. 2015;11:967.

Burn J, Pirmohamed M. Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin: is new always better than the old?. Open Heart. 2018 Feb 1;5(1):e000712.

Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Eng J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):883-91.

Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Eng J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):981-92.

Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Eng J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51.

Ghanny S, Crowther M. Treatment with novel oral anticoagulants: indications, efficacy and risks. Curr Opin Hematol. 2013 Sep 1;20(5):430-6.

Lurie Y, Loebstein R, Kurnik D, Almog S, Halkin H. Warfarin and vitamin K intake in the era of pharmacogenetics. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Aug 1;70(2):164-70.

Bami K, Nielsen JC, Alings M, Conen D, Verma A, Birnie D, et al. Current attitudes towards oral anticoagulant use to treat cardiac device patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation: results from a four-nation physician survey. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manage. 2015;15:1969-75.

Amara W, Larsen TB, Sciaraffia E, Hernández Madrid A, Chen J, et al. Patients’ attitude and knowledge about oral anticoagulation therapy: results of a self-assessment survey in patients with atrial fibrillation conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association. Ep Europace. 2015 Oct 12;18(1):151-5.

Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Diener HC, Hacke W, et al, Advisors:. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. EP Europace. 2015 Aug 31;17(10):1467-507.

Ahmed Z, Hassan S, A Salzman G. Novel oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism with special emphasis on risk of hemorrhagic complications and reversal agents. Current Drug Therapy. 2016 Apr 1;11(1):3-20.

Nakamura M, Yamada N, Ito M. Novel anticoagulant therapy of venous thromboembolism: current status and future directions. Ann Vasc Dis. 2017 Jun 25;10(2):92-8.

Cohen AT, Hamilton M, Mitchell SA, Phatak H, Liu X, Bird A, Tushabe D, Batson S. Comparison of the novel oral anticoagulants apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in the initial and long-term treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0144856.

Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):955-62.

Hsu JC, Chan PS, Tang F, Maddox TM, Marcus GM. Differences in anticoagulant therapy prescription in patients with paroxysmal versus persistent atrial fibrillation. Am J Medicine. 2015 Jun 1;128(6):654-e1.

Gibson CM, Mehran R, Bode C, Halperin J, Verheugt FW, Wildgoose P, et al. Prevention of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI. N Eng J Med. 2016 Dec 22;375(25):2423-34.

Haas S, Bode C, Norrving B, Turpie AG. Practical guidance for using rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation: balancing benefit and risk. Vascular health and risk management. 2014;10:101.

Cohen D. Dabigatran: how the drug company withheld important analyses. BMJ. 2014 Jul 23;349:g4670.

Pollack Jr CV, Reilly PA, van Ryn J, Eikelboom JW, Glund S, Bernstein RA, et al. Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal-full cohort analysis. N Eng J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):431-41.

Kubitza D, Becka M, Mueck W, Halabi A, Maatouk H, Klause N, et al. Effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;70(5):703-12.

Schulman S. Advantages and limitations of the new anticoagulants. J Internal Med. 2014 Jan;275(1):1-1.

Kubitza D, Becka M, Roth A, Mueck W. Dose-escalation study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in healthy elderly subjects. Curr Med Res Opinion. 2008 Oct 1;24(10):2757-65.

Kubitza D, Becka M, Voith B, Zuehlsdorf M, Wensing G. Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of single doses of BAY 59‐7939, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Clin Pharmacol Therapeutics. 2005 Oct 1;78(4):412-21.

Hinojar R, Jiménez-Natcher JJ, Fernández-Golfín C, Zamorano JL. New oral anticoagulants: a practical guide for physicians. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacoth. 2015 Feb 25;1(2):134-45.

Abraham NS, Singh S, Alexander GC, Heien H, Haas LR, Crown W, et al. Comparative risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2015 Apr 24;350:h1857.

Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M, Zhang R, Southworth MR, Levenson M, et al. Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014 Oct 30:114.