Assessment of tubercle bacilli in various organs by staining and polymerase chain reaction technique

Authors

  • Minali Raja Department of Pathology, Govt. Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
  • Tanvi . Department of Paediatric, Govt. Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20184184

Keywords:

Polymerase chain reaction, Staining techniques, Tubercle bacilli

Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) by different clinical methods plays a major role in control of TB in early stages. The present study was done with the aim to assess and compare the efficiency of staining techniques and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of tubercle bacilli in various organs.

Methods: The study included data 14,472 patients of both prospective (during March 2008 to 2009) and retrospective cases (past one year of the study period). For prospective cases the cytological material for the study was collected by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). For retrospective cases of past one year were retrieved from the records. TB suspected cases were evaluated by Ziel-Nelson (ZN), Auramine-Rhodamine (A-R) staining techniques and by PCR.

Results: Total 284 cases were diagnosed with TB in various organs. In them, epithelioid granuloma was seen 227 cases (79.92%) and Langhans giant cells were seen in 18 cases (6.34%). AFB positivity on ZN staining was observed in 161 cases (56.69%) and 9 cases (3.16%) showed positivity for tubercle bacilli on A-R staining. PCR was done in 20 prospective cases and total percentage of positivity by PCR was seen in 18 cases (90%).

Conclusions: The total percentage positivity for detection of tubercule bacilli by PCR assay was found to be more (90%) with high sensitivity and specificity compared to ZN (56.6%) and AR staining techniques (3.16%).

References

Kumar V, Abbas A K, Nelson F, Mitchel RN. Robbins Basic Pathology. 8th Ed. Saunders Elsevier; 2007:516-522.

Green C, Huggett JF, Talbot E, Mwaba P, Reither K, Zumla AI. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis through the detection of mycobacterial DNA in urine by nucleic acid amplification methods. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:505-11.

Kulkarni HK, Wiseman MPJ, Jayaprakash T, Banur A, Basavarajappa KG, Jayasimha VL, et al. Evaluation of Different Staining Methods for the Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Sputum Samples. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;4(12):536-40.

Jonas V, Alden MJ, Curry JI, Kamisango K, Knott CA, Lankford R, Wolfe JM, Moore DF. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by amplification of rRNA. J Clin Microbio. 1993;31:2410-241.

Hale YM, Pfyffer GE, Salfinger M. Laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections: new tools and lessons learned. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:834-46.

Sarmiento OL, Weigle KA, Alexander J, Weber DJ, Miller WC. Assessment by meta-analysis of PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3233-40.

Soini H, Musser JM. Molecular diagnosis of mycobacteria. Clin Chem. 2001;47:809-14.

Jha BC, Dass A, Nagarkar NM, Gupta R, Singhal S. Cervical tuberculous lymphadenopathy: changing clinical pattern and concepts in management Postgrad Med J. 2001;77:185-7.

Hirachand S, Lakhey M, Akhter J, Thapa B. Evaluation of fine needle aspiration cytology of lymph nodes in Kathmandu Medical College, Teaching hospital. Kathmandu University Med J. 2009;7(2):139-42.

Chakma T, Rao PV, Pall S, Kaushal LS, Datta M and Tiwary RS. Survey of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a Primitive Trible of Madhya Pradesh. Ind J Tub. 1996;43:85-9.

Tan KB, Thamboo TP, Wang SC, Nilsson B, Rajwanshi A, Salto-Tellez M. Audit of Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration of the Lung: Cytological Subclassification of Bronchogenic Carcinomas and Diagnosis of Tuberculosis. Singapore Med J. 2002;43(11):570-5.

Ariel BM, El'kin AV, Basek TS, Ostashko OM, Katser LI. Morphological features of fibro-cavernous pulmonary tuberculosis according to the surgical material. Arkh Patol. 2004;66(1):14-8.

Singhal A, Gulatia A, Frizellb R, Manninga AP. Abdominal tuberculosis in Bradford, UK: 1992-2002. European J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;17:967-71.

Trsca EM, Trsca ET, Buzulica R, Dragoi GH, Nicolescu I. The place and the role of histological examination in diagnostic algorithm of urinary system tuberculosis. Romanian J Morphol Embryol. 2005;46(2):105-8.

Masood S. Diagnosis of tuberculosis of bone and soft tissue by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagnostic Cytopathol.1992;8(5):451-5.

Francis IM, Das DK, Luthra UK, Sheikh Z, Sheikh M, Bashir M. Value of radiologically guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis: a study of 29 cases. Cytopathol. 1999;10(6):390-401.

Mondal SK, Dutta TK. A Ten year clinicopathological study of female genital tuberculosis and impact on fertility. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2009;48(173):52-7.

Liu P, Shi ZY, Lau YJ, Hu BS. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis by a simplified nested amplification protocol. Neurol. 1994;44:1161-4.

Puneet, Tiwary SK, Ragini R, Singh S, Gupta S, Shukla V. Breast Tuberculosis. Intl J Tropical Med. 2005;2(2):1540-2681.

Barnes P, Weatherstone R. Tuberculosis of the thyroid. Two case reports. Br J Dis Chest. 1979;73:187-91.

Patra AC, Gharami RC, Banerjee PK. A profile of cutaneous tuberculosis. Indian J Dermatol. 2006;51(2):105-7.

Masood Z, Mohammad N, Majid K, Ghodsieh A, Comaparison of the value of two different sputum staining for diagnosis of acid fast bacilli. Iranian J Clin Infect Dis. 2008;3(2):99-102.

Amin I, Idrees M, Awan Z, Shahid M, Afzal S, Hussain A. PCR could be a method of choice for identification of both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:332.

Greco S, Rulli M, Girardi E, Piersimoni C, Saltini C. Diagnostic Accuracy of In-House PCR for pulmonary tuberculosis in smear-positive patients: meta analysis and metaregression. J Clin Microbiol. Mar 2009;47:569-76.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-22

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles