DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20191150

Ultrasound evaluation of non-cystic renal masses and correlation with ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy

Shyam Chhadi, Tulsi Chhadi, Jalinder Limbgaonkar

Abstract


Background: The purpose of present study was to identify sonologically, the cystic and non-cystic renal mass lesions, to attempt differentiating benign lesions from the malignant ones and to correlate ultrasound findings with ultra sonographically guided cytological or pathological findings.

Methods: In this hospital based prospective observational study, all the patients with confirmed renal mass were subjected to USG guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). All the patients presenting with lump in abdomen, haematuria or pain in abdomen, wherein the clinical diagnosis of renal mass was being considered by the clinician, were enrolled for the study. Total 54 participants were enrolled. Those with confirmed renal mass were subjected to USG guided FNAC and which was carried out in supine position by transabdominal route in all patients.

Results: About 42 participants were retained for final analysis; since FNAC was not possible in 12 patients. Pain in abdomen (36, 85.7%), mass in abdomen (34, 81%) were the most predominant clinical findings. Mixed echogenicity was the commonest echo pattern (42, 77.7%) on ultrasonography. Histopathologic/cytologic examination of the 39 malignant cases confirmed renal cell carcinoma (18, 46.5%) to be the commonest malignancy, followed by Wilms’ tumour (10, 26%). Out of the 39 cases in which clinico-radiological diagnoses were correlated with histo-cytological diagnoses, it was found to be consistent in 30 (77%) cases and inconsistent in 9 (23.1%) cases.

Conclusions: Fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy performed under ultrasonography guidance demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy. It is hence recommended as part of fundamental approach to the diagnosis of non-cystic renal mass.


Keywords


Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), Non-cystic renal mass, Ultrasound abdomen

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kang SK, Chandarana H. Contemporary imaging of the renal mass. Urol Clin. 2012;39(2):161-70.

Hartman DS, Choyke PL, Hartman MS. From the RSNA refresher courses: a practical approach to the cystic renal mass. Radiographics. 2004;24(1):101-15.

Bosniak MA. The small (less than or equal to 3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiol. 1991;179(2):307-17.

Martin HE, Ellis EB. Biopsy by needle puncture and aspiration. Ann Surg. 1930;92(2):169.

Charboneau JW, Hattery RR, Ernst 3rd EC, James EM, Williamson Jr B, Hartman GW. Spectrum of sonographic findings in 125 renal masses other than benign simple cyst. Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140(1):87-94.

Holm HH. Ultrasonic scanning in the diagnosis of space-occupying lesions of the upper abdomen. Brit J Radiol. 1971;44(517):24-36.

Krishnamurthy SC. Aspiration cytology of kidney. In: Aspiration cytology for clinicians and pathologists. Krishnamurthy SC, eds. Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai. 1991:228-236.

Juul N, Pederson ST, Gronvall S. Ultrasonologically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal masses. J Urol. 1985;133:579-58.

Dey P, Radhika S, Das A, Nijhawan R. Aspiration cytology of renal cell carcinoma and adenoma in childhood. Acta Cytol. 1996;40:457-60.

Bosniak MA. The small (less than or equal to 3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiol. 1991;179(2):307-17.

Cohen HT, McGovern FJ. Renal-cell carcinoma. New Eng J Med. 2005;353(23):2477-90.

Quijano G, Drut R. Cytologic characteristics of Wilms' tumors in fine needle aspirates. A study of ten cases. Acta Cytol. 1989;33(2):263-6.

Dey PR, Radhika SR, Rajwanshi AR, Rao KL, Khajuria AR, Nijhawan RA, et al. Aspiration cytology of Wilms' tumor. Acta Cytol. 1993;37(4):477-82.

Civardi G, Fornari F, Cavanna L, di Stasi M, Rossi S, Buscarini E, et al. Ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (UG-FNAB): a useful technique for the diagnosis of abdominal malignancies. Euro J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986;22(2):225-7.