Selective Imidazoline Receptor Agonists: redefining the role of centrally acting agents in management of hypertension

Authors

  • Sadanand Shetty Consultant Cardiologist, Dr. Sadanand Shetty Clinic, Sitaram Bhavan, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Anil Bhoraskar Consultant Diabetologist, Balchandra Niwas, Dadar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • J. C. Mohan Department of cardiology and Sr. consultant cardiology at Fortis Hospital, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi, India
  • Deodatta Chafekar Consultant Nephrologist, Shri Samarth Hospital, Sharangpur, Nasik, Maharashtra, India
  • K. Tripathi Consultant Nephrologist, Delhi Heart and Lung Institute in Mandir Marg, Delhi, India
  • M. Sivalingam Department of Nephrologist, Sundaram Medical Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Bhupen Desai Consultant Cardiologist, Bhupen Desai, Bandra West, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Dilip Gude Department of Diabetologist, Vrinchi Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • G. Sridhar Consultant Nephrologist, Global Hospital, Hyderabad, India
  • Chacko Varghese Consultant Nephrologist, Jubilee Memorial Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
  • V. T. Shah Consultant Physician, VT Shah clinic, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Ramesh Dargad Consultant Physician, Mukund Hospital, Andheri-East, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20194234

Keywords:

Blood pressure, Metabolic syndrome, Moxonidine, Selective Imidazoline Receptor Agonists, Sympathetic activity

Abstract

Hypertension, often referred to as ‘The silent killer’, is christened so, as it is seldom preceded by any warning signs or symptoms. With the new ACC/AHA guidelines lowering the Blood Pressure (BP) threshold values, it has resulted in a 140% relative increase in the hypertension prevalence in India, which is 3 times higher than that of in United States. Imidazoline receptor agonists control BP effectively with minimal adverse effects of sedation and mental depression that are usually associated with centrally acting antihypertensives. While having a low affinity to the α2-adrenergic receptors, these new generation centrally acting antihypertensive agents are highly selective for imidazoline receptor. Moxonidine, a second-generation centrally acting antihypertensive drug having selective agonist activity on imidazoline I1 receptors and minor activity on imidazoline α2 adrenoceptors, reduces the activity of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) by activating I1 imidazoline receptors in Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla (RVLM). Studies of moxonidine have shown equal effectiveness in lowering BP like other well-established antihypertensive drugs such as nifedipine, atenolol or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with minimal adverse events. At doses of 0.2-0.6 mg, moxonidine induces satisfactory BP reduction in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. In patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, moxonidine (0.2-0.4 mg o.d.) significantly decreased Systolic Blood Pressure/Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP/DBP), respectively, by 19.5/11.6 mmHg. In obese, non-controlled hypertensive patients, there is a 14% and 13.5% reduction in the mean SBP and DBP, respectively, from the baseline value after moxonidine treatment and during the follow-up with an additional reduction in body weight, plasma leptin levels and Body Mass Index (BMI) (p<0.01). Thus, moxonidine could be considered as a therapeutic option in obese patients with metabolic syndrome.

References

Makridakis S, DiNicolantonio JJ. Hypertension: empirical evidence and implications in 2014. Open Heart. 2014 Jul 1;1(1):e000048.

Shere A, Eletta O, Goyal H. Circulating blood biomarkers in essential hypertension: a literature review. J Lab Precis Med. 2017;2(99):1-11.

Narang R, Srikant S. Implications of 2017 hypertension guidelines for Indian patients. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci. 2018;4(1):3-5.

enkateshmurthy NS, Geldsetzer P, Jaacks LM, Prabhakaran D. Implications of the new American College of Cardiology Guidelines for hypertension prevalence in India. JAMA Int Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1416-8.

Goldstein DS, Eisenhofer G. Sympathetic Nervous System Physiology and Pathophysiology in Coping with the Environment. 2011. First published: 01 January 2011.

Moreira MC, Pinto IS, Mourão AA, Fajemiroye JO, Colombari E, Reis AA, et al. Does the sympathetic nervous system contribute to the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome?. Frontiers Physiol. 2015 Aug 25;6:234.

Wyss JM. The role of the sympathetic nervous system in hypertension. Curr Opinion Nephrol Hypert. 1993;2:265-73.

Barrett CJ. Renal sympathetic nerves–what have they got to do with cardiovascular disease?. Experimental physiology. 2015 Apr 1;100(4):359-65.

Ernsberger P, Haxhiu MA, Graff LM, et al. A Novel Mechanism of Action for Hypertension Control: Moxonidine as a Selective Ii-Imidazoline Agonist. Cardiovas Drugs Ther. 1994;8(1):27-41.

Yu A, Frishman WH. Imidazoline receptor agonist drugs: a new approach to the treatment of systemic hypertension. J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Feb;36(2):98-111.

Nikolic K and Agbaba D. Imidazoline Antihypertensive Drugs: Selective I1-Imidazoline Receptors Activation. Cardiovascular Therapeutics. 2012;209-16.

Karlafti EF, Hatzitolios AI, Karlaftis AF, Baltatzi MS, Koliakos GG, Savopoulos CG. Effects of moxonidine on sympathetic nervous system activity: An update on metabolism, cardio, and other target-organ protection. J PharmBioallied Sci. 2013;5(4):253-6.

Ollivier JP, Christen MO. I1-imidazoline-receptor agonists in the treatment of hypertension: an appraisal of clinical experience. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;24(1):S39-48.

Zwieten V. Centrally acting antihypertensives: a renaissance of interest: mechanisms and haemodynamics. J hypertension. 1997;15(1):S3-8.

Vongpatanasin W, Kario K, Atlas SA, Victor RG.et al. Central Sympatholytic Drugs. J Clin Hypertension. 2011;13(9):658-61.

Sica DA. Centrally Acting Antihypertensive Agents: An Update. J Clin Hypertension. 2007;9(5):399-405.

Schachter M. Metabolic effects of moxonidine and other centrally acting antihypertensives. Diabetes Obes Metab. 1999;1(6):317-22.

Webster J, Koch HF. Aspects of tolerability of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996;27(3):S49-54.

Farsang C. Moxonidine: Clinical Profile. J Clin Basic Cardiol. 2001;4(3):197.

Martin U, O’ Mahony D. Use of moxonidine in elderly patients with resistant hypertension. J Clin Pharmacy and Therapeut. 2005;30(5):433-7.

Abellán J, Leal M, Hernández-Menárguez F, García-Galbis JA, Martínez-Pastor A, de Vinuesa SG, et al. Efficacy of moxonidine in the treatment of hypertension in obese, noncontrolled hypertensive patients. Kidney Int Suppl. 2005;(93):S20-4.

Prichard BNC, Graham BR. The use of moxonidine in the treatment of hypertension. J Hypert. 1997;15(1):S47-55.

Uzokov JK, Alyavi AL, Akhmedov IY, Karimov BB, Rakhmonkulov EJ. Efficacy and safety of combined antihypertensive therapy with ramipril and moxonidine in patients with metabolic syndrome. J Am Society Hypert. 2016;10(4S):e39-e55.

Sanjuliani AF, de Abreu VG, Braga JU, et al. Effects of Moxonidine on the Sympathetic Nervous System, Blood Pressure, Plasma Renin Activity, Plasma Aldosterone, Leptin, and Metabolic Profile in Obese Hypertensive Patients. J Clin Basic Cardiol. 2004;7(1):19-25.

Wenzel RR, Mitchell A, Siffert W, Bührmann S, Philipp T, Schäfers RF. The I1 -imidazoline agonist moxonidine decreases sympathetic tone under physical and mental stress. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 57(5):545-51.

Krespi PG, Makris TK, Hatzizacharias AN, Triposkiadis P, Tsoukala C, Kyriaki D, et al. Moxonidine Effect on Microalbuminuria, Thrombomodulin, and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Levels in Patients with Essential Hypertension. Cardiovas Drugs Ther. 1998;12(5):463-7.

Littlewood KJ, Greiner W, Baum D, et al. Adjunctive treatment with moxonidine versus nitrendipine for hypertensive patients with advanced renal failure: a cost-effectiveness analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2007;8(1):9.

Rochlani Y, Pothineni NV, Kovelamudi S, Mehta JL. Metabolic syndrome: pathophysiology, management, and modulation by natural compounds. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2017; 11(8):215-25.

Singh J, Rajput M, Rajput R. Prevalence and Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome in a North Indian Rural Population: A Community Based Study. J Glob Diabetes Clin Metab. 2016;1(2):1-5.

Kaur J. A Comprehensive Review on Metabolic Syndrome. Cardiol Research Practice. 2014;1-21.

De la Sierra A. Metabolic Syndrome in Hypertension - Treatment Challenges and Goals. Eur Cardiol. 2009:5(2):40-3.

Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005 Oct 25;112(17):2735-52.

Makaryus N, Akhrass P, Mcfarlane S. Treatment of Hypertension in Metabolic Syndrome: Implications of Recent Clinical Trials. Curr Diab Rep. 2009 Jun;9(3):229-37.

Chazova I, Almazov VA, Shlyakhto E. Moxonidine improves glycaemic control in mildly hypertensive, overweight patients: a comparison with metformin. 2006;8(4):456-65.

Sharma AM, Wagner T, Marsalek P. Moxonidine in the treatment of overweight and obese patients with the metabolic syndrome: a postmarketing surveillance study. J Human Hypert. 2004 Sep;18(9):669.

Messerli F. Moxonidine: a new and versatile antihypertensive. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000;35(4):S53-6.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-23

Issue

Section

Review Articles