DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20161093

Comparative study of blood parameters among widal positive and negative cases of enteric fever in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Maharashtra, India

Pravin N. Soni, Seema P. Soni, prakash A. Ambekar

Abstract


Background: Enteric fever is very common and serious infectious disease in tropical country like India. There is need for research in prognosis of enteric fever on the basis of locality of patient’s i.e. urban or rural area. Also, there is scope for research on fever on the basis of OPD (out patient department) or IPD (In patient department) setting.

Methods: We have taken widal positive and negative cases from January to December 2014 and they were compared on the hematological and prognostic parameters. Widal positive cases were grouped into IPD and OPD cases as well as those hailing from rural and urban area. These were also compared on the hematological and prognostic parameters.

Results: Widal positive group has significantly higher leucocyte count than widal negative group. Also, widal positive group has more chances of having neutrophilia than widal negative group. Lymphocytes were higher in widal negative group. It is also found that lymphocyte count was significantly lower in widal positive group. We got more platelet count in widal positive cases. We compared IPD versus OPD patients; it was found that IPD patients took lesser time for fever to subside. There was no significant difference in fever duration at admission and duration of fever to subside.

Conclusions: IPD care is better than OPD care in enteric patients. Apart from leukocyte count, haemoglobin and platelet count in enteric fever should be analyzed in enteric fever.


Keywords


Enteric fever, Widal test, Rural area, Urban area

Full Text:

PDF

References


Crump JA, Luby SP, Mintz ED. The global burden of enteric fever. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:346-53.

Levine MM, Tapia MD, Zaidi AKM. Enteric and paraenteric (enteric) fever. Chapter 16. In: Tropical infectious diseases: principles, pathogens and practice. Third ed: Elsevier Inc.; 2011.

Crump JA, Mintz ED. Global trends in enteric and paraenteric fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:241-6.

Parry CM, Wijedoru L, Arjyal A, Baker S. The utility of diagnostic tests for enteric fever in endemic locations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9:711-25.

Pal S, Prakash R, Juyal D, Sharma N, Rana A, Negi S. The baseline widal titre among the healthy individuals of the hilly areas in the garhwal region of uttarakhand. India J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(3):437-40.

House D, Chinh NT, Diep TS, Parry CM, Wain J, Dougan G, et al. Use of paired serum samples for serodiagnosis of enteric fever. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4889-90.

Kulkarni ML, Rego SJ. Value of single widal test in the diagnosis of enteric fever. Indian Journal of Paediatrics. 1994;31(11):1373-6.

Iqbal N, Basheer A, Mookkappan S, Ramdas A, Varghese RG, Padhi S, et al. Clinicopathological Profile of Salmonella Typhi and Paratyphi Infections presenting as fever of unknown origin in a tropical country. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2015;7:21-7.

Jog S, Soman R, Singhal T, Rodrigues C, Mehta A, Dastur FD. Enteric Fever in Mumbai – clinical profile, sensitivity patterns and response to antimicrobials. JAPI. 2008;56:237-40.

Lalremruata R, Chadha S, Bhalla P. Retrospective audit of the widal test for diagnosis of enteric fever in pediatric patients in an endemic region. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(5):22-5.