A comparative study of spot urine versus 24 hour urine in assessment of proteinuria in varying degree of renal dysfunction

Authors

  • Naufal Rizwan Taraganar Abubacker Assistant Professor, Saveetha Medical College Hospital, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  • Sarfaraz Ahmed Taraganar Abubacker Assistant Professor, General Medicine, SRM Medical College Hospital, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  • Kannan Rajendran Professor, General Medicine, Saveetha Medical College Hospital, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  • Senthil Manikandan Thirumanilayur Jayaraman Assistant Professor, Saveetha Medical College Hospital, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  • Prasanna Karthik Suthakaran Assistant Professor, Saveetha Medical College Hospital, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  • Mahendrakumar Kalappan Assistant Professor, Saveetha Medical College Hospital, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20151532

Keywords:

Protein -creatinine ratio, Proteinuria, Urine analysis, 24 hours urinary protein

Abstract

Background: Proteinuria is a condition in which urine contains an excess amount of proteins. The gold standard test for evaluation of proteinuria is 24 hour urinary protein estimation which is a cumbersome process. The rate of urinary protein excretion remains variable and no standard values have been established for timed samples. However since it remains a very simple procedure to perform, evaluation of the predictive nature of the test in comparison to the 24 hour method is necessary. The aim of the study was to compare the 24 hour urinary protein excretion expected from 7 am and 7 pm spot urine protein creatinine ratio with the estimated urine protein from a 24 hours urinary sample collection.

Methods: 55 patients with persistent dipstick positive proteinuria with varying degrees of renal dysfunction were included in this study. Two urine samples were collected, one in the early morning (around 7 am) and other in the evening (around 7 pm). Both samples were used to estimate protein – creatinine ratio and calculate expected 24 hours urinary protein excretion. 24 hours urine protein estimation was done simultaneously and compared.

Results: There was significant positive correlation with both the samples though the better correlation was seen in early morning urine sample than evening sample (r = 0.931 for 7am sample & r = 0.872 in 7 pm sample; p <0.01). The maximum correlation was seen in patients with normal/mild renal dysfunction and non nephrotic range proteinuria while it was lesser in patients with moderate/severe renal dysfunction and nephrotic range proteinuria.

Conclusions: Spot Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio may be used as an alternative for the 24 hour urinary protein excretion as it has a good correlation with the longer method. The early morning sample may be a preferable one.

References

Carroll MF, Temte JL. Proteinuria in Adults: A Diagnostic Approach. Am Fam Physician. 2000;62(6):1333-40.

Denker B, Brenner B. Azotemia and Urinary abnormalities. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 17th edition. McGraw – Hill medical publishing division, 2008

Cameron JS. The Patient with Proteinuria and/or haematuria. Oxford Textbook of Clinical Nephrology, 3rd edition. Oxford Medical Publication, 2005.

Keane WF. Proteinuria: its clinical importance and role in progressive renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35;S97-105.

Keane WF, Eknoyan G. Proteinuria, Albuminuria, Risk, Assessment Detection, Elimination (PARADE): A position paper of National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:1004-10.

Price CP, Newall RG, Boyd JC. Use of Protein: Creatinine Ratio Measurements on Random Urine Samples for Prediction of Significant Proteinuria: A Systematic Review. Clin Chem. 2005;51(9):1577-86.

Kerr DN. Normal values in Renal Medicine. Medicine. 1982;23:1047.

Silink M, Cowell CT, Rogers S. First Morning urinary albumin concentration is a good predictor of 24 hours urinary albumin excretion in patients with type I (insulin dependent) Diabetes. Diabetologia. 1986;29:697-99.

Gisberg JM, Chang BS, Matarese RA, Garella S. Use of single voided urine sample to estimate quantitative proteinuria. N Eng J Med. 1983;309:1543-6.

Rodby RA, Rohde RD, Lewis EJ, Sharon J, Pohl MA, Bain RP. The ratio as a predictor of 24 hour urine protein excretion in Type I diabetic patients with Nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:904-9.

Koopman MG, Krediet RT, Koomen GC. Circadian Rhythm of proteinuria: Consequences of the use of urinary protein Creatinine ratio. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1989;4:9-14.

Mohan V, Merra R, Premalatha G. Frequency of proteinuria in type 2 Diabetics seen at a Diabetic center in Southern India. Post Grad Med J. 2000;76:569-573.

Leung YY, Szeto CC, Tam LS, Lam CWK, Li1 EK, Wong KC. Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio in an untimed urine collection is a reliable measure of proteinuria in lupus nephritis. Rheumatology. 2007;46:649-52.

Agarwal I, Kirubakaran C, Markandeyulu and Selvakumar. Quantitation of proteinuria by spot urine sampling. Ind J Clin Biochem. 2004;19(2):45-7.

Siwach SB, Karla OP, Sharma R, Singh V, Chopra JS. Estimation of 24 hour protein exerction from single random urine specimen. Ind J Med Red. 1990;92:105-8.

Sharma BK, Jain PK, Jindal SK. Urinary protein excretion in normal Indian subjects. Ind J Med Res. 1981;74:286.

Goldman R. Creatinine excretion in renal failure. Procs exp Biol Med. 1954;85:446.

Carrie BJ, Golbetz HV, Michaels AS, Myers BD. Creatinine: an inadequate filtration marker in glomerular diseases. Am J Med. 1980;69(2):177-82.

Perrone RD, Madias NE, Levey AS. Serum creatinine as an index of renal function: new insights into old concepts. Clin Chem. 1992;38(10):1933-53.

Levey AS, Perrone RD, Madias NE. Serum creatinine and renal function. Annu Rev Med. 1988;39:465-90.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-05

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles