Comorbidity pattern of personality disorder and reliability of diagnostic and statistical manual-111-R and international classification of diseases-10 in assessing personality disorders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20205037Keywords:
Personality disorders, Comorbidity, Concordance, Prison inmates, DSM-111-R, ICD-10Abstract
Background: Comorbidity of personality disorders (PD) is mostly assessed in relation to axis1 disorders in spite of its high prevalence in clinical practice. It’s assessment in the prison community, a non-clinical setting, using the diagnostic and statistical manual (DSM-111-R) and the international classification of diseases (ICD-10) may reveal the natural pattern of axis-11 comorbidity and test the reliability of both instruments in assessing PD. Objectives of the study were to determine the pattern of comorbidity of PD in a non-clinical setting and to confirm the reliability of DSM-111-R and ICD-10 in assessing PD.
Methods: Healthy prison inmates who consented to the study were interviewed using international personality disorder examination (IPDE), a semi structured questionnaire modified to conform to DSM-111-R and ICD-10 classifications and approved by World health organization (WHO). The data obtained was fed into the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS/PC+). Cross tabulation of variables using chi-square and t-tests. Agreement between both instruments was examined with kappa.
Results: The study shows that ICD-10 is more likely to diagnose PD than DSM-111-R. Both instruments showed good concordance for schizoid, histrionic, and dependent PD, poor concordance for obsessive and borderline PD and very poor concordance for avoidant PD. The likelihood of having more than one axis-11 disorder is high lightened.
Conclusions: Pattern of PD in the prison has been established. DSM-111-R and ICD-10 have been found reliable in assessing PD except for avoidant PD where they disagreed. The high rate of multiple PD diagnoses in prison inmates calls for functional health care programs in the prisons.
References
Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P. Synopsis of psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry. 11th edition. 2019.
Widiger TA, Rogers JH. Prevalence and comorbidity of PD. Psychiatr Ann. 1989;19(3):136.
Enyidah NS. Personality Disorder in a Nigerian Prison community. J Adv Med Medic Res. 2020;32(9):61-5.
Enyidah NS, Nonye-Enyidah Esther I. Pattern and correlates of Personality Disorder and Substance Use Disorder in the prison community. Eur J Res Med Sci. 2020;8(2):1-7
Loranger AW. The WHO/ADAMHH International Pilot Study of PD; background and purpose. J Pers Disord. 1991;5(3):296-306.
World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases. 1990; 10th edition. Available at: https//www.who.int>icd>ICD10. Accessed on 24 August 2020.
World Health Organization. The seventh seminar on standardization of Psychiatric Diagnosis, Classification and Statistics of Personality Disorders and Drug Dependence. Tokyo Report 1972b: Mimeographed document 1971.
Ottosson H, Ekselius L, Grann M, Kullgren G. Cross-system Concordance of PD Diagnosis of DSM-111R and Diagnostic criteria for Research of ICD-10. J Pers Disord. 2002;6(3):283-92.
Loranger AW. Personality Disorder Examination (PDE) Manual. Yonkers NY. DV Communications. 1988.
Cohen J. A Coefficient of agreement for normal scale. Edu Psychol Mean. 1960;(20):37-46.
Andrews G, Slade T, Peters L. Classification in Psychiatry, ICD-10 versus DSM-IV. Br J Psychiatr. 1999;174:3-5.
Stercevic V, Bogojevic G, Kelin K. Diagnostic agreement between the DSM-IV and ICD-10 DCR PD. Psychopathology. 1997;30(6):323-34.
Loranger AW, Sarorius N, Andreoli A, Berger P. The International Personality Disorder Examination; The WHO/Alcohol/Drug Abuse and mental Health Administration, International Pilot study in PD. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 1994;51(3):215-24.
Oldham JM, Skodol AE, Kellman HD, Hyles SE, Rosemick L, Davis M. Diagnosis of DSM-111-R PD by two structured interviews, Pattern of Comorbidity. Am J Psychiatr. 1992;149:213-20.
