DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20210271

A study of clinical profile of pneumonia in Shivamogga institute of medical science attached hospital with special reference to curb scoring

Eshwarappa P., Naveen Kumar R. A., Ranganatha M., Ranjith Kumar G. K.

Abstract


Background: Our study was done to study in detail the clinical profile of cases admitted with pneumonia to Mc Ganna hospital, SIMS, Shivamogga. Aim of the study were to study in detail the clinical profile of pneumonia and to know the morbidity and mortality associated with pneumonia by comparing with CURB score.

Methods: Ours is a clinical, prospective, observational and open study. The study subjects were pneumonia patients admitted to Shivamogga institute of medical sciences attached McGann hospital, Shivamogga with signs and symptoms suggestive of pneumonia. After obtaining a detailed history and clinical examination the patients were subjected to relevant investigations. The complete data was collected in specially designed case recording form and transferred into a master chart which is then subjected to statistical analysis.

Results: We studied 100 cases of pneumonia, out of which 12 patients presented with confusion, 30 patients presented with raised blood urea nitrogen, 28 patients with raised respiratory rate, and 30 patients with hypotension. CURB score of 0 was observed in 54 patients, score 1 in 16 patients, score 2 in 8 patients and score 3 in 22 patients. Prognosis was good in patients aged less than 50 years and those without any comorbidities. Fever was the most common symptom of presentation.

Conclusions: Our study had highlighted the fact that CURB scoring is helpful in triaging pneumonia patients but it is not a good predictor of mortality in pneumonia patients.


Keywords


CURB, Pneumonia, SIMS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Manor HE, Porath A. Community acquired pneumonia; aetiology and usefulness of severity criteria on admission. Thorax.1996;51(10);1010-6.

Tobias W, Thomas K. Seminar in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. Community Acquired Pneumonia. 2009;30(2);127-35.

Durrngton HJ, Summers CH. Recent changes in the management of community acquired pneumonia in adult, BMJ. 2008;336;1429-33.

Hoare Z. Clinical research fellow of the University of Nottingham, Wei Shen Lim, consultant in general and respiratory medicine. BMJ. 2005;330:26.

Singanayagam A, Chalmers JD, Hill AT. Severity assessment in community-acquired pneumonia: a review. Qjm. 2009;102(6):379-88.

Buising KL, Thursky KA, Black JF, MacGregor L, Street AC, Kennedy MP et al. A prospective comparison of severity scores for identifying patients with severe community acquired pneumonia: reconsidering what is meant by severe pneumonia. Thorax. 2009;61(5):419-24.

American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America: Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare- associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:388.

Bansal S, Kashyap S, Pal LS, Goel A. Clinical and bacteriological profile of community acquired pneumonia in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. Indian j chest diseases allied sci. 2004;46:17-22.

Aujesky D, Auble TE, Yealy DM. Prospective comparison of three validated prediction rules for prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med. 2005;118:384-9.