Comparison of the effects of volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation modes on hemodynamics, respiratory mechanics and blood gas parameters in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Ferda Y. Inal; Yadigar Y. Camgoz; Hayrettin Daskaya; Oznur Sen

doi:10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20213172

Authors

Ferda Y. Inal Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
Yadigar Y. Camgoz Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Sultan Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Hayrettin Daskaya Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
Oznur Sen Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20213172

Keywords:

Volume-controlled ventilation, Pressure-controlled ventilation, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the changes induced by VCV and PCV modes in hemodynamics, respiration (airway pressures, gas exchange parameters) and metabolism (acid-base balance) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: Patients were divided into two randomised groups as volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) group (VC) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) group (PC). The following parameters were recorded at 3 different time points: T1: in supine position 10 minutes after induction of anaesthesia, T2: 15 minutes after CO₂ insufflation in inverted Trendelenburg position (head 30 degrees up), T3: 10 minutes after CO₂ desufflation. HR, SpO₂, SAP (systolic arterial pressure), DAP (diastolic arterial pressure), MAP (mean arterial pressure), PetCO₂(end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure), P_peak, P_plateau, P_mean, Vt (tidal volume) and compliance with the available data, the cases in both groups Vd, Vd/Vt ratios and P(A-a)O₂ were calculated. Arterial blood gas parameters (pH, PaO₂, PaCO₂, SaO₂, P(a-et)CO₂) values were recorded.

Results: It was found that P_peak and P_plateau values were significantly higher in the VC group (p<0.05). It was found that compliance was significantly higher in the PC group (p<0.05) (p<0.01). In the postoperative period, it was found that PaO₂ values were significantly higher in the PC group compared to the VC group (p<0.05). It was found that the P(A-a)O₂ values of the PC group were significantly higher than those of the VC group during the desufflation phase (p<0.05).

Conclusions: We think that PCV mode can be a good alternative for the prevention and correction of physiopathological changes due to laparoscopic surgery.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Peters JH, Ellison CE. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1991;213(1):3-12

Johnson D, Litwin D, Osachoff J, McIntosh D, Bersheid B, Church D, et al. Respiratory function after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992;2(3):221-6.

Rademaker BM, Ringers J, Odoom JA, Dewit LT, Kalkman CJ, Oosting J. Pulmonary function and stress response after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison with subcostal incision and influence of thoracic epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg. 1992;75(3):381-5.

Joris J, Ledoux D, Honore P, Lamy M. Ventilatory effects of CO2 insufflation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology. 1991;75(3):121-5.

Al-Saady N, Bennett ED. Decelerating inspiratory flow waveform improves lung mechanics and gas exchange in patients on intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 1985;11(2):68-75.

Campbell RS, Davis BR. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation: what is the matter? Respir Care. 2002;47(4):416-24.

Markstrom AM, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Svensson BA, et al. Ventilation with constant versus decelerating inspiratory flow in experimentally induced acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology. 1996;84(4):882-9.

Marini JJ, Ravenscraft SA. Mean airway pressure: physiologic determinants and clinical importance- part 2: clinical implications. Crit Care Med. 1992;20(11):1604-16.

Marco AJ, Yeo CJ. Rock: Anesthesia for the patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology. 1990;73(6):1268-70.

Cunningam AJ, Brul SJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: anaesthetic implications. Anesth Analg. 1993;76(5):1120-33.

Tyagi A, Kumar R, Sethi AK, Mohta M. A comparison of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(6):503-8.

Oğurlu M, Kucuk M, Sızlan A, Yanarateş O, Eksert S, Karaşahin E, et al. Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(3):295-300.

Baerdemaeker LE, Herten CVD, Gillardin JM, Pattyn P, Mortier EP, Szegedi LL. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2008;18(6):680-5.

Cadi P, Guenoun T, Journois D, Chevallier JM, Diehl JL, Safran D. Pressure-controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(5):709-16.

Nethra SS, Nagaraja S, Sudheesh K, Duggappa DR, Sanket B. Comparison of effects of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled mode of ventilation on endotracheal cuff pressure and respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomies: A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64(10):842-8.

Movassagi R, Montazer M, Mahmoodpoor A, Fattahi V, Iranpour A, Sanaie S. Comparison of pressure vs volume-controlled ventilation on oxygenation parameters of obese patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(5):1117-22.

Mihalj M, Vladić D, Karlović Z, Zadro Ž, Majerić Kogler V. Effects of pressure-controlled volume-controlled ventilation on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters in patients during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Clin Croat. 2017;56(3):555-60.

Wang JP, Wang HB, Liu YJ, Lou XP, Wang XD, Kong Y. Comparison of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation in laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Clin Invest Med. 2015;38(3): 119-41.

Ozyurt E, Kavakli AS, Ozturk NK. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomised clinical trial. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019;69(6):546-52.

Choi S, Yang SY, Choi GJ, Kim BG, Kang H. Comparison of pressure and volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):17007.

Lee JM, Lee SK, Rhim CC, Seo KH, Han M, Kim SY, et al. Comparison of volume-controlled, pressure-controlled, and pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation during robot-assisted laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery in the Trendelenburg position. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17(17):2728-34.

Balick-Weber CC, Nicolas P, Hedreville-Montout M, Blanchet P, Ste'phan F. Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of volume-controlled vs pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: a cross-over study with echocardiographic assessment. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:429-35.