The rate of endoscopic observation of the major duodenal papilla can be increased by simple guideline
Keywords:Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, Major papilla, Observation rate
Background: Ampullary lesions are being detected with increased frequency with the growing use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. However, it is uncertain how frequently endoscopists properly visualize the major papilla in routine clinical practice. This study was undertaken to determine the actual rate of observing the major papilla by endoscopists and if there is a room for improvement in visualizing the duodenal major papilla when performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized study involving 3,088 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy at tertiary-care referral center between September and November 2010. Six fellows-in-training in the study group attempted to visualize the major papilla up to three times, while six fellows-in-training in the control group performed endoscopy in a standard fashion.
Results: The overall observation rate was significantly higher in study group (975 of 1070 [91.1%]) than in control group (624 of 1022 [61%], p<0.001). “Complete observation” was achieved in 68.2% of the cases in study group compared to 45.0% of the cases in control group (p<0.001). The total procedure time was slightly, but significantly longer in the study group (5.82±2.38 min versus 5.52±2.11 min, p=0.003).
Conclusions: The rate of observing the major papilla for endoscopists is not as high as expected in routine clinical practice; however, the rate of observing the major papilla might improve significantly through application of additional effort with but a modest increase in procedural time.
Rey JF, Lambert R, Committee EQA. ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2001;33:901-3.
Pyun DK, Moon G, Han J. A carcinoid tumor of the ampulla of Vater treated by endoscopic snare papillectomy. Korean J Intern Med. 2004;19:257-60.
Yamashita Y, Ito K, Fujita N. A case of early carcinoma of the papilla of Vater confined to the mucosa and continuative epithelium of glands in Oddi's sphincter (m-God) treated by endoscopic papillectomy. Intern Med. 2010;49:2447-50.
Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Won SY, Lee SS, Min YI. Tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:609-20.
Sobol S, Cooperman AM. Villous adenoma of the ampulla of Vater. An unusual cause of biliary colic and obstructive jaundice. Gastroenterology. 1978;75:107-9.
Dardinski VJ. The Anatomy of the Major Duodenal Papilla of Man, with Special Reference to its Musculature. J Anat. 1935;69:469-78.
Horiguchi S, Kamisawa T. Major duodenal papilla and its normal anatomy. Dig Surg. 2010;27:90-3.
Avisse C, Flament JB, Delattre JF. Ampulla of Vater. Anatomic, embryologic, and surgical aspects. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:201-12.
Mirilas P, Colborn GL, Skandalakis LJ, Skandalakis PN, Zoras O, Skandalakis JE. Benign anatomical mistakes: "ampulla of Vater" and "papilla of Vater". Am Surg. 2005;71:269-74.
Bleau BL, Gostout CJ. Endoscopic treatment of ampullary adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996;22:237-41.
Merchea A, Cullinane DC, Sawyer MD, Iqbal CW. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy-associated gastrointestinal perforations: a single-center experience. Surgery. 2010;148:876-80.
Seifert E, Schulte F, Stolte M. Adenoma and carcinoma of the duodenum and papilla of Vater: a clinicopathologic study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:37-42.
Bohnacker S, Seitz U, Nguyen D, Thonke F, Seewald S, deWeerth A, et al. Endoscopic resection of benign tumors of the duodenal papilla without and with intraductal growth. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:551-60.
Kong H, Kim YS, Hyun JJ, Cho YJ, Keum B, Jeen YT, et al. Limited ability of capsule endoscopy to detect normally positioned duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:538-41.
Park JS, Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Lee SS, Chang HS, et al. The clinical significance of papillitis of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:877-82.
Rosenberg J, Welch JP, Pyrtek LJ, Walker M, Trowbridge P. Benign villous adenomas of the ampulla of Vater. Cancer. 1986;58:1563-8.
Benhamiche AM, Jouve JL, Manfredi S, Prost P, Isambert N, Faivre J. Cancer of the ampulla of Vater: results of a 20-year population-based study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:75-9.
Burke CA, Beck GJ, Church JM, van Stolk RU. The natural history of untreated duodenal and ampullary adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis followed in an endoscopic surveillance program. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:358-64.
Mizoue T, Yoshimura T, Tokui N, Hoshiyama Y, Yatsuya H, Sakata K, et al. Prospective study of screening for stomach cancer in Japan. Int J Cancer. 2003;106:103-7.
Faulx AL, Vela S, Das A, Cooper G, Sivak MV, Isenberg G, Chak A. The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: a national Web survey. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(1):9-15.
Pena LR, Mardini HE, Nickl NJ. Development of an instrument to assess and predict satisfaction and poor tolerance among patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:1860-71.
Meining A, Semmler V, Kassem AM. The effect of sedation on the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: an investigator-blinded, randomized study comparing propofol with midazolam. Endoscopy. 2007;39:345-9.
Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M, Julkunen R. Is routine sedation or topical pharyngeal anesthesia beneficial during upper endoscopy? Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:686-94.
Abraham NS, Fallone CA, Mayrand S, Huang J, Wieczorek P, Barkun AN. Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1692-9.
McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:910-23.