Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding enteric fever among doctors of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University

Kaoser Alam; Mohammad Jahan Shams; Chowdhury Rehnuma Tabassum; Mahfuzur Rahman Uzzal; M. Zakir Hasan; M. A. Jalil Chowdhury; Mohammad Ferdous Ur Rahaman

doi:10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20233817

Authors

Kaoser Alam Department of Internal Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Mohammad Jahan Shams Department of Clinical Oncology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Chowdhury Rehnuma Tabassum Department of Pediatric Neurology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Mahfuzur Rahman Uzzal Department of Orthodontics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
M. Zakir Hasan Department of Internal Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
M. A. Jalil Chowdhury Department of Internal Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Mohammad Ferdous Ur Rahaman Department of Internal Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20233817

Keywords:

Enteric fever, General practitioners, Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, Diagnostic methods, Treatment Protocols

Abstract

Background: Enteric fever remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in developing countries. Understanding the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of general practitioners regarding enteric fever is crucial for effective disease management and control. This study aims to assess these aspects among general practitioners, providing insights into current practices and identifying areas for improvement.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted with 200 general practitioners. The questionnaire covered various aspects, including baseline characteristics, knowledge about enteric fever causative agents and symptoms, diagnostic practices, antibiotic preferences, and general attitudes towards management and prevention. Data were analyzed to determine the prevalence of specific knowledge and practices.

Results: Majority of practitioners (74%) were residents, predominantly working indoors (61.5%). All respondents correctly identified Salmonella typhi and para typhi as causative agents and fever as a primary symptom. However, there was variability in recognizing other symptoms and diagnostic methods. Ceftriaxon was the most preferred antibiotic (67%), and blood culture correctly identified as gold standard for diagnosis by 71% of respondents. Attitudes and practices varied, with significant number not adhering to recommended diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Conclusions: The study reveals a solid foundation of basic knowledge about enteric fever among general practitioners but also highlights significant gaps in the understanding of clinical symptoms, diagnostic practices, and treatment protocols. These findings underscore the need for enhanced educational initiatives and standardized guidelines to improve the management of enteric fever.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Haramohan S, Mohammad A, Prgyan T. Enteric fever-revisited. Int J General Med Pharmacy. 2016;5(3):1-12

Paul UK, Barik KL, Sinharay K, Banik S, Bandyopadhyay A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of general practitioners regarding typhoid fever. Int J Sci Stud. 2016;3(10):1-4.

Parry CM, Hein TT, Dougan G, White NJ, Farrar JJ. Typhoid fever. 2002;347(22):1770-82.

Ahasan H, Rafiqueddin A, Chowdhury M, Azad K, Karim M, Hussain A. An unusual presentation of typhoid fever: Report of four cases. Bangladesh J Med. 1993;11(3):101-3.

Bhutta ZA. Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of typhoid fever. Bmj. 2006;333(7558):78-82.

Organization WH, others. Report of the WHO Informal Consultation on the" Evaluation and Testing of Insecticides", WHO/HQ, Geneva, 7 to 11 October 1996. World Health Organization. 1996. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/ctd-whopes-ic-96.1. Accessed on 2 October 2023.

Dewan AM, Corner R, Hashizume M, Ongee ET. Typhoid fever and its association with environmental factors in the Dhaka metropolitan area of Bangladesh: a spatial and time-series approach. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis. 2013;7(1):e1998.

Gerba CP. Environmentally transmitted pathogens. In: Environmental microbiology. Elsevier. 2009;445-84.

Crump JA, Luby SP, Mintz ED. The global burden of typhoid fever. Bull Worl Heal Organ. 2004;82(5):346-53.

Chowdhury MJ, Shumy F, Anam AM, Chowdhury MK. Current status of typhoid fever: A review. Bangladesh Med J. 2014;43(2):106-11.

Butler T. Treatment of typhoid fever in the 21st century: promises and shortcomings. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(7):959-63.

Alam M, Haq S, Majid M, Hasan Z, Ahsan S, Ahmed N et al. Multidrug resistant enteric fever in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Med. 1992;3(2):38-41.

Sakr F, Toufaili Z, Akiki Z, Akel M, Malaeb D, Dabbous M et al. Fever among preschool-aged children: a cross-sectional study assessing Lebanese parents’ knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding paediatric fever assessment and management. BMJ Open. 2022;12(10):e063013.

Jamil H, Din MFU, Tahir MJ, Saqlain M, Hassan Z, Khan MA et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever among general people: A cross-sectional study in Pakistan. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2022;16(12):e0010988.

Boran S, Kahri̇man İ. Evaluation of Fever-Related Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Mothers of Children with Chronic Diseases: A Descriptive Study. JBACHS. 2023;7(1):223-34.

Ng HL, Li H, Jin X, Wong CL. Parental knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards childhood fever among South-East and East Asian parents: A literature review. Plos One. 2023;18(9):e0290172.