Hemodynamic changes during off-pump versus on-pump cardiac surgeries

Authors

  • Abul B. M. Siddique Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Abu Taher Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Salim Moral Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mohammed S. Ahmed Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Hassnul Alam Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Harun-Ur-Rashid Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20250368

Keywords:

CABG, On-pump surgery, Off-pump surgery, CPB

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a vital procedure for treating coronary artery disease (CAD). Traditionally, CABG is performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), known as on-pump surgery, which can cause complications like systemic inflammatory response and organ dysfunction. The primary objective of this study was to compare the hemodynamic changes during off-pump and on-pump cardiac surgeries, focusing on heart rate, blood pressure, and other key intraoperative and postoperative parameters.

Methods: This prospective observational study at BSMMU (2021-2022) compared hemodynamic changes in 160 patients undergoing on-pump and off-pump cardiac surgeries. Data were collected preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively in the intensive care unit (ICU). Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), with t-tests and Chi-square tests applied for comparisons.

Results: The study compared 160 patients (80 on-pump, 80 off-pump). The off-pump group had a lower heart rate (72±8 versus 75±10 beats/min, p=0.045) and higher mean arterial pressure (88±11 versus 85±12 mmHg, p=0.032). ICU stay was shorter in the off-pump group (2.8±1.0 versus 3.5±1.2 days, p=0.027), as was total hospital stay (6.5±1.8 versus 8.5±2.3 days, p=0.015). Thirty-day mortality was 3.8% for on-pump and 2.5% for off-pump (p=0.112), with one-year mortality at 6.3% versus 3.8% (p=0.089).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that off-pump cardiac surgery results in improved hemodynamic stability, reflected in lower heart rates and higher mean arterial pressure during surgery compared to on-pump surgery.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Do QB, Goyer C, Chavanon O, Couture P, Denault A, Cartier R. Hemodynamic changes during off-pump CABG surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21(3):385-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00009-X

Couture P, Denault A, Limoges P, Sheridan P, Babin D, Cartier R. Mechanisms of hemodynamic changes during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49(8):835-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03017418

Sirivella S, Gielchinsky I. Hemodynamic changes during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: experience using pericardial bands for target stabilization. World J Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;3(8):151-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2013.38045

Mishra M, Malhotra R, Mishra A, Meharwal ZS, Trehan N. Hemodynamic changes during displacement of the beating heart using epicardial stabilization for off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002;16(6):685-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jcan.2002.128418

Carvalho AR, Guizilini S, Murai GM, Begot I, Rocco IS, Hossne NA Jr, et al. Hemodynamic Changes During Heart Displacement in Aorta No-Touch Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Pilot Study. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;33(5):469-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0090

Kuiper AN, Trof RJ, Groeneveld AJ. Mixed venous O2 saturation and fluid responsiveness after cardiac or major vascular surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-8-189

Neff TA, Fellmann C, Fuechslin RM, Gerber AC, Weiss M. The Panomat® P-10 micro-volumetric infusion pump is suitable for continuous drug administration at minimal flow rates. Canad J Anesth. 2002;49(10):1048-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03017900

Silva FS. Severe intraoperative anaphylactic reaction: aprotinin and rocuronium. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;22(5):740-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2007.05.010

Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, Huber PR, Block PC, Duke PG, et al. Off-Pump vs Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Early and 1-Year Graft Patency, Cost, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes. JAMA. 2004;291(15):1841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.15.1841

Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Gomes WJ, Angelini GD. On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(2):493-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00566-4

Kirkpatrick JN, Bernacki GM. Primary prevention statins in older patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(1):28-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.024

Mueller M, Zajonz T, Mann V, Koerner C, Akintuerk H, Yoerueker U, et al. Interrelations of Intraoperative Changes in Cerebral Tissue Oxygen Saturation with Brain Volumes and Neurodevelopment Outcome After the Comprehensive Stage II Procedure in Infants With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;35(10):2907-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.013

Alloah Q, Pelletier G, Prada-Ruiz AC, Tsuda T. Rapid growth of left atrial thrombus in a pediatric heart transplant recipient. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;113(2):e133-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.021

Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, Flather M, Clague J, Davies S, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(1):21-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031282

Raja SG, Benedetto U, Amrani M. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: Evolution, evidence, and practical insights. Int J Surg. 2015;16:133-41.

Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Lotto AA, Pitsis AA, Angelini GD. Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(4):1198-204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01152-8

Diegeler A, Börgermann J, Kappert U, Breuer M, Böning A, Ursulescu A, et al. Off-Pump versus On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13):1189-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211666

Associate Editorial Board 2015. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev439

Munthe-Fog L, Hummelshøj T, Honoré C, Madsen HO, Permin H, Garred P. Immunodeficiency associated withFCN3Mutation and Ficolin-3 deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(25):2637-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0900381

Huang Y, Wu W, Cao Y, Qu N. All cause mortality of cardiac resynchronization therapy with implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2010;145(3):413-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.05.016

Mery CM, Khan MS, Guzmán-Pruneda FA, Verm R, Umakanthan R, Watrin CH, et al. Contemporary results of surgical repair of recurrent aortic arch obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(1):133-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.065

Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Paolasso E, et al. Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(16):1489-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1200388

Peterss S, Bhandari R, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Kuzmik GA, Ziganshin BA, et al. The Aortic Root: Natural History After Root-Sparing Ascending Replacement in nonsyndromic aneurysmal patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;103(3):828-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.081

Downloads

Published

2025-02-21

How to Cite

Siddique, A. B. M., Taher, A., Moral, M. S., Ahmed, M. S., Alam, M. H., & Harun-Ur-Rashid , M. (2025). Hemodynamic changes during off-pump versus on-pump cardiac surgeries. International Journal of Advances in Medicine, 12(2), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20250368

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles