Correlation between ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and office blood pressure monitoring in healthcare professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20251939Keywords:
Hypertension, Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, Office blood pressure monitoring, White coat hypertension, Masked hypertensionAbstract
Background: Hypertension is a leading global risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is crucial for effective diagnosis and management. Office blood pressure monitoring (OBPM) is commonly used but may be influenced by the white coat effect and masked hypertension, leading to misdiagnosis. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), which records BP over 24 hours, provides a more comprehensive assessment, particularly in high-stress populations like healthcare professionals.
This study aimed to assess the prevalence of hypertension, white coat hypertension, and masked hypertension among healthcare professionals and evaluate the concordance between OBPM and ABPM.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College, Jhansi, involving 300 healthcare professionals, including doctors, nursing staff, and paramedical personnel. Participants underwent both OBPM under standardized conditions and 24-hour ABPM during routine activities. The data were analyzed to compare BP readings and identify discrepancies between the two methods.
Results: OBPM underestimated the prevalence of hypertension compared to ABPM. Among 300 participants, ABPM detected 26 individuals (8.67%) with masked hypertension and 17 (5.67%) with white coat hypertension. Significant discrepancies were observed, particularly in identifying nocturnal hypertension and BP variability.
Conclusions: The findings highlight the limitations of OBPM in diagnosing hypertension among healthcare professionals. ABPM provides a more accurate assessment, improving hypertension detection and management. Routine use of ABPM may help mitigate cardiovascular risk by identifying undiagnosed cases of hypertension.
Metrics
References
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):37-55.
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Contributions of mean and shape of blood pressure distribution to worldwide trends and variations in raised blood pressure: a pooled analysis of 1018 population-based measurement studies with 88.6 million participants. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(3):872-83.
Shimbo D, Abdalla M, Falzon L, Townsend RR, Muntner P. Role of Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(9):691-700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1270
Viera AJ, Neutze DM. Diagnosis of secondary hypertension: an age-based approach. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82(12):1471-8.
Parati G, Stergiou G, O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G, et al; European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2014;32(7):1359-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000221
O'Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G, et al; European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2013;31(9):1731-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000017
Palatini P, Benetos A, Grassi G, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Mancia G, et al; European Society of Hypertension. Identification and management of the hypertensive patient with elevated heart rate: statement of a European Society of Hypertension Consensus Meeting. J Hypertens. 2006;24(4):603-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000217838.49842.1e
Stergiou GS, Alpert B, Mieke S, Asmar R, Atkins N, Eckert S, et al. A universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Collaboration Statement. J Hypertens. 2018;36(3):472-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001634
Franklin SS, Thijs L, Hansen TW, O'Brien E, Staessen JA. White-coat hypertension: new insights from recent studies. Hypertension. 2013;62(6):982-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01275
Di Giosia P, Giorgini P, Stamerra CA, Petrarca M, Ferri C, Sahebkar A. Gender Differences in Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment of Hypertension. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018;20(3):13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-018-0716-z
Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e563-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000677
Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Kirmani JF, Divani AA, Mohammad Y. Is prehypertension a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases? Stroke. 2005;36(9):1859-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000177495.45580.f1
Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojón A, Fernández JR. Influence of circadian time of hypertension treatment on cardiovascular risk: results of the MAPEC study. Chronobiol Int. 2010;27(8):1629-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2010.510230
Choxi AA, Degnan M, Candiotti KA, Rodriguez-Blanco YF. Patterns of Blood Pressure and Stress: A Descriptive Report among Anesthesiology Residents Institution. J Educ Perioper Med. 2017;19(2):E601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46374/volxix-issue2-choxi
Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365(9455):217-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17741-1