Ultrasound-guided popliteal block for foot and ankle surgery: a prospective observational study of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction

Authors

  • Parth S. Patel Critical Care Medicine, Civil Hospital BJMC and Sterling Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20262350

Keywords:

Ultrasound guidance, Popliteal block, Sciatic nerve, Foot and ankle surgery, Regional anaesthesia, Patient satisfaction

Abstract

Background: Regional anaesthesia has become an integral component of modern perioperative care owing to its ability to provide superior postoperative analgesia while reducing opioid consumption and avoiding the physiological perturbations associated with general anaesthesia. Ultrasound-guided popliteal block has emerged as an effective technique for surgeries involving the foot and ankle, offering precise localisation of neural structures and improved procedural success. However, clinical data evaluating its effectiveness in the Indian population remain limited. Aim was to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, block characteristics, postoperative analgesia, and patient satisfaction associated with ultrasound-guided popliteal block as the primary anaesthetic technique for foot and ankle surgery.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in 60 adult patients (ASA physical status I to III) undergoing elective or emergency foot and ankle surgery. Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block was performed using a mixture of 10 ml of 1.5% lignocaine and 5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. Procedural time, onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration of postoperative analgesia, haemodynamic variables, block success, complications, and patient satisfaction were recorded and analysed.

Results: The mean procedure time was 4.1±1.3 minutes. Sensory blockade occurred after 3.1±1.0 minutes, while motor blockade developed after 7.0±1.3 minutes. Mean duration of sensory blockade was 183±14.8 minutes and motor blockade lasted 144.3±13.3 minutes. The first postoperative complaint of pain occurred after 239.0±21.6 minutes. Haemodynamic parameters remained stable throughout the perioperative period. Only one block required conversion to general anaesthesia, resulting in an overall success rate of 96.7%. No procedure-related complications were observed, and all remaining patients reported high satisfaction with the anaesthetic technique.

Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block is a safe, reliable, and effective primary anaesthetic technique for foot and ankle surgery. It provides rapid onset, prolonged postoperative analgesia, excellent patient satisfaction, and minimal complications. Wider adoption of this technique may contribute to enhanced recovery protocols and reduced perioperative opioid requirements.

References

Locke RK, Locke SE. Nerve blocks of the foot. JACEP. 1976;5(9):698-702.

Hansen E, Eshelman MR, Cracchiolo A 3rd. Popliteal fossa neural blockade as the sole anesthetic technique for outpatient foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(1):38-44.

Rorie DK, Byer DE, Nelson DO, Sittipong R, Johnson KA. Assessment of block of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Anesth Analg. 1980;59:371-6.

Schimek F, Deusch H. New technique of sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1995;12(2):163-9.

Guntz E, Herman P, Debizet E, Delhaye D, Coulic V, Sosnowski M. Sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa: description of a new medial approach. Can J Anaesth. 2004;51:817-20.

Hegewald K, McCann K, Elizaga A, Hutchinson BL. Popliteal blocks for foot and ankle surgery: success rate and contributing factors. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53:176-8.

Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ. Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks: what are the benefits? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(6):727-37.

Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(1):7-17.

Creech C, Meyr AJ. Techniques of popliteal nerve regional anesthesia. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52:681-5.

Miller SJ. Use of popliteal blocks in foot and ankle surgery. 2001;220-3.

Adriani J. Labat's Regional Anesthesia: Techniques and Clinical Applications. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1967: 317-321.

Brown DL. Popliteal block. In: Brown DL, editor. Atlas of Regional Anesthesia. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1992: 109.

Beskin JL, Baxter DE. Regional anesthesia for ambulatory foot and ankle surgery. Orthopedics. 1987;10(1):109.

Provenzano DA, Viscusi ER, Adams SB Jr, Kerner M, Abidi NA. The safety and efficacy of the popliteal fossa nerve block for foot and ankle surgery. Presented at: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society 31st Annual Meeting; San Francisco. CA. 2001.

Rongstad KM, Mann RA, Prieskorn D, Nicholson S, Horton G. Popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative analgesia. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17(7):378-82.

Hadzic A, Vloka JD. A comparison of the posterior versus lateral approaches to the block of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(6):1480-6.

Zetlaoui PJ, Bouaziz H. Lateral approach to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(1):79-82.

Southerland JT, Boberg JS, Downey MS, Nakra A. Local anesthetics. In: McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2009.

Phillips WJ, Troutman G, Lerant A. Nerve stimulator-assisted sciatic nerve block for painful procedures in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(9):1130-5.

Rodríguez J, Taboada M, Carceller J, Lagunilla J, Bárcena M, Alvarez J. Stimulating popliteal catheters for postoperative analgesia after hallux valgus repair. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(1):258-62.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16

How to Cite

Patel, P. S. (2026). Ultrasound-guided popliteal block for foot and ankle surgery: a prospective observational study of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. International Journal of Advances in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20262350

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles