Magnetic resonance imaging‑based preoperative planning of pedicle screw length in traumatic lumbar spine injuries: a prospective study in a resource‑limited setting

Kawu Ahidjo Abdulkadiri; Misbahu Haruna Ahmad; Oderinde Gbadebo Afeez; Maruf Sherif Temitope; Aremu Abdurrahman Bolaji; Buba Lukman Baba

doi:10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20262829

Authors

Kawu Ahidjo Abdulkadiri National Orthopedic Hospital, Dala Kano, Nigeria
Misbahu Haruna Ahmad Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
Oderinde Gbadebo Afeez National Orthopedic Hospital, Dala Kano, Nigeria
Maruf Sherif Temitope National Orthopedic Hospital, Dala Kano, Nigeria
Aremu Abdurrahman Bolaji National Orthopedic Hospital, Dala Kano, Nigeria
Buba Lukman Baba National Orthopedic Hospital, Dala Kano, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20262829

Keywords:

MRI, Pedicle screw, Traumatic lumbar spine, Vertebral body purchase, Gertzbein‑Robbins classification, Resource‑limited setting

Abstract

Background: Accurate preoperative determination of pedicle screw length is essential for safe and effective spinal stabilisation in traumatic lumbar injuries. In resource‑limited settings where computed tomography (CT) may be unavailable, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers a radiation‑free alternative. This prospective study evaluated the utility of MRI for predicting pedicle screw length, vertebral body purchase, and screw accuracy in traumatic lumbar spine injuries.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted at National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala, Kano, from January 2025 to December 2025. Two hundred pedicle screws (6.5 mm diameter; lengths 40 mm, 45 mm, and 50 mm) were inserted in patients with traumatic lumbar fractures (L1-L5). Preoperative MRI measured the pedicle‑vertebral body length (PVBL). Screw length was selected to achieve ≥75% vertebral body purchase. Postoperative CT assessed screw accuracy using the Gertzbein‑Robbins classification, with inter‑observer agreement calculated.

Results: Mean PVBL was 44.8±3.6 mm (range 38-54 mm), with significant variation across lumbar levels: L1 42.4±3.1 mm, L2 43.8±3.4 mm, L3 45.2±3.5 mm, L4 46.8±3.7 mm, and L5 45.6±3.9 mm. MRI‑predicted PVBL showed strong correlation with actual screw length (Pearson’s r=0.89, p<0.001). Vertebral body purchase ≥75% was achieved in 172 screws (86.0%). Screw accuracy (Gertzbein‑Robbins grades A/B) was 92.0% (184/200), with inter‑observer agreement of κ=0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92). The 50 mm screws achieved the highest purchase (78.4±4.2%) but had a slightly higher breach rate (6.0%) compared with 45 mm screws (4.5%).

Conclusions: MRI‑based preoperative planning effectively predicts pedicle screw length and achieves ≥75% vertebral body purchase in 86% of traumatic lumbar injuries. The strong correlation between MRI‑predicted PVBL and actual screw length supports MRI as a viable alternative to CT in resource‑limited settings, with high screw accuracy confirmed on postoperative CT.

References

Nwankwo OE, Uche EO. Epidemiological and treatment profiles of spinal cord injury in southeast Nigeria. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(6):448-52.

Obalum DC, Giwa SO, Adekoya-Cole TO, Enweluzo GO. Profile of spinal injuries in Lagos, Nigeria. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(2):134-7.

Gaines RW Jr. The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(10):1458-76.

Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH, Amin AG, Rick AM, Suk I, et al. Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1):170-8.

Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine. 2010;35(11):E465-70.

Jutte PC, Castelein RM. Complications of pedicle screws in lumbar and lumbosacral fusions in 105 consecutive primary operations. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(6):594-8.

Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine. 2004;29(3):333-42.

Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors. Only 42% of Nigeria's CT scanners are in public hospitals, most in private hands. Nairametrics. 2025. Available at: https://nairametrics.com/2025/07/29/only-42-of-nigerias-ct-scanners-are-in-public-hospitals-most-in-private-hands-nard/. Accessed on 26 June 2026.

Nnadi C, Orakwe S, Nwadinigwe C, Ede O. Challenges of spinal surgery in a developing country: a Nigerian perspective. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(2):S210-5.

Bozzo A, Marcoux J, Radhakrishna M, Pelletier J, Goulet B. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(8):1401-11.

Abel F, Lebl DR, Gorgy G, Dalton D, Chazen JL, Lim E, et al. Deep-learning reconstructed lumbar spine 3D MRI for surgical planning: pedicle screw placement and geometric measurements compared to CT. Eur Spine J. 2024;33(11):4144-54.

Krag MH, Weaver DL, Beynnon BD, Haugh LD. Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(1):27-32.

Chua A, Siddiqui S, Yu CS, Nolan CP, Oh JYL. The optimal screw length of lumbar pedicle screws during minimally invasive surgery fixation: a computed tomography-guided evaluation of 771 screws. Asian Spine J. 2019;13(6):936-41.

Polly DW Jr, Potter BK, Kuklo TR, Young S, Johnson C, Klemme WR. Volumetric spinal canal intrusion: a comparison between thoracic pedicle screws and thoracic hooks. Spine. 2004;29(1):63-9.

Kankam SB, Okon II, Habibzadeh A, Rehman IU, Toriola O, Gbayisomore TJ, et al. Navigating challenges in spine surgery in Nigeria: the current state and strategies for advancing spine care. Neurosurg Rev. 2024;47(1):265.

O’Neill JSO, Finneran AR, Sembrano MJ, Polly DW Jr. Comparison of preoperative pedicle screw measurement between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(6):945-951.

Pacha TO, Omar M, Graulich T, Suero E, Schröder BM, Krettek C, Stubig T. Comparison of preoperative pedicle screw measurement between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(5):671-80.

Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine. 1990;15(1):11-4.

Abel F, Lebl DR, Gorgy G. Deep-learning reconstructed lumbar spine 3D MRI for surgical planning: pedicle screw placement and geometric measurements compared to CT. Eur Spine J. 2024;33(11):4144-54.

Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, et al. Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987;12(2):160-6.

Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Yeasting RA. Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine. 1997;22(3):233-8.

Nkwerem SP, Ohaegbulam SC, Mezue W, Asuzu MC, Okwunodolu FU, Ezeonu CT. Lumbar pedicle dimensions using CT scan in adults of South-Eastern Nigeria as related to transpedicular fixation. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024;14(4):396-402.

Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Karageorgos AC, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(2):247-55.

Belmont PJ Jr, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, Polly DW Jr. In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(21):2340-6.

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277-84.