Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging findings in low back pain patients with daily travel time and mode

Authors

  • Shailesh G. Sangani Department of Radiology, Terna Sahyadri Speciality Hospital & Research Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Manjiri M. Joshi Department of Radiology, Terna Sahyadri Speciality Hospital & Research Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Chhaya S. Sangani Department of Radiology, Terna Sahyadri Speciality Hospital & Research Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Krupa A. Dave Department of Radiology, Terna Sahyadri Speciality Hospital & Research Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

Travel time, Travel mode, Disc herniation, Low back pain, Metro cities, Magnetic resonance imaging scan

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is the major worldwide cause of pain and it is caused mainly due to long day sedentary work style in office and long hours of travelling in metro cities. The aim was to correlate the association of LBP with increase in time of travel and different modes of travel in metro cities.

Methods: Of all the LBP patients referred from orthopedic outpatient department to Radiology Department for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) spine, 200 cases of those who travelled minimum 2 h daily and more were considered for this study.

Results: The results showed correlation of increase in incidence of degenerative changes in spine and changes in disc with increase in travelling time and also the different modes of travel. The changes increased with time significantly in younger population.

Conclusions: In our study of 200 patients complaining of LBP and having changes is spine reported on MRI showed reliable association of the LBP to the daily travelling of minimum 2 h and more, and associated with mode of travel, particularly two wheelers followed by public transport.

References

Brdley WG Jr, Expert Panel on Neuroimaging. Low back pain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:990-2.

Roudsari B, Jarvik JG. Lumbar spine MRI for low back pain: indication & yield. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(3):550-9.

Tool. MRI as evidence based medicine & guidline. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:3.

Savage RA, Whitehouse GH, Roberts N. The relationship between the MRI appearance of the lumbar spine & low back pain, age & occupation in males. Eur Spine J. 1997;6:106-14.

Flynn TW, Smith B, Chou R. Appropriate use of diagnostic imaging in low back pain’ A reminder that Unnecessary imaging may do as much harm as good. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(11):838-46.

Hanrahan CJ, Shah LM. MRI of spinal bone marrow: part 2, T1-weighted imaging-based differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1309-21.

Degenerative disc lesions on MRI in LBP patients. Lect Indian MJ. 2010;59.

Role of MRI in acute LBP/cancer related. J Gen Int Med. 2003;18.

Janardhana AP, Rajagopal, Rao S, Kamath A. Correlation between clinical features and MRI findings in lumbar disc prolapse. Indian J Orthop. 2010;44(3):263-9.

Seidenwurm DJ, Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging. Myelopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(5):1032-4.

Pott’s disease – Medscape reference. Available from: http://www.Emedicine.medscape.com/article/226141-overview.

Sreedhar CM, Sree Ram MN, Alam A, Indrajit IK, Shanmuganandan K. Sacroilitis in routine MRI for low back pain. Indian J Radiol. 2006;16(4):60.

Moorthy S, Sreekumar KP, Prabhu NK. Pictorial essay: MRI finding in occult spinal dysraphism. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2003;13(1):67-74.

Tethered cord/radiology, reference article. Available from: http://radiopaedia.org.

Spinal cord injuries: Medscape reference. Available from: http://www.Emedicine.medscape.com/article/793582.

Subacute combined degeneration of the cord. Available from: http://www.ispub.com/IJRA/10/1/3775.

Serial IVD changes in childhood - Dr. Teja Lund ORTON Orthopaedic hospital Finland.

MRI study of muscle (trunk) size in a sport person & normal individual. Br J Sports Med. 2007:04402.

Borup LH, Meehan JJ, Severson JM, Kaufman K. Terminal spine of agave plant extracted from patients spinal cord. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(4):1155-6.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-12

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles