DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20172281

Accuracy of transverse cerebellar diameter measurement by ultrasonography in the evaluation of foetal age

Ravindernath M. L., Mahender Reddy, Nihar Reddy

Abstract


Background: Assessment of accurate gestational age of fetus is very imperative for proper obstetric management of normal as well as IUGR pregnancies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of transverse cerebellar diameter as against the conventional parameters of Biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length in normal pregnant mothers between 15 to 40 weeks and in antenatal diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation.

Methods: Study done on 100 women attending antenatal department, 80 were normal pregnancy cases and 20 were clinically suspected IUGR cases. In each patient BPD, HC, AC, FL and TCD was measured. Correlation of TCD was done with other measured parameters as well as with estimated gestational age of fetus.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the age and parity distributions of two groups It was seen that 18 cases were below the fifth percentile for AC and HC, 19 cases were below the fifth percentile for BPD and 16 cases were below the fifth percentile for FL. In 16 out of 20 cases the TCD values were within the normal range. Only in 4 cases the TCD values were below the 5th percentile. This difference in number of cases below the 5th percentile for BPD, HC, AC, FL and TCD was statistically significant (p-value=0.001). In 20 IUGR cases the gestational age predicted by transverse cerebellar diameter measurements closely correlated with gestational age predicted by last menstrual period.

Conclusions: It was found that there is good correlation between TCD and other parameters. Also, TCD shows good correlation with gestational age. It is better than BPD in circumstances like excessive moulding and dolichocephaly. Also, TCD measurement is not fraught with problems as encountered in FL measurement.


Keywords


Abdominal circumference, Biparietal diameter, Femur length, Head circumference

Full Text:

PDF

References


Simpson LL. Fetal growth and wellbeing. A practical guide to ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1988:403-416.

Degani S. Fetal biometry: clinical, pathological, and technical considerations. Obstet Gynaecol Surv. 2001;56:159-67.

Lerner JP. Fetal growth and well-being. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2004;31:159-76.

Deter RL, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP, Carpenter RJ. Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: II. A critical re-evaluation of the relationship to menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound. 1982;10(8):365-72.

Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Deter RL, Park SK. Fetal femur length as a predictor of menstrual age: sonographically measured. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;138(5):875-8.

Chavez MR, Ananth CV. Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement with particular emphasis in the third trimester: A reliable predictor of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:979-84.

Davies MW, Swaminathan M, Betheras FR. Measurement of the transverse cerebellar diameter in preterm neonates and its use in assessment of gestational age. Australas Radiol. 2001;45(3):309-12.

Scott KE, Usher R. Fetal malnutrition: Its incidence causes and effects. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1966;94:951

Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. How accurate is second trimester fetal dating J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10(10):557-61.

Mcleary RD, Kuhns LR, Barr M. Ultrasonography of the fetal cerebellum. Radiology. 1984;151:439- 42.

Reece EA, Goldstein I, Pilu G, Hobbins JC. Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal growth and development. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:1065-9.

Smith PA, Johansson D, Tzannatos C, Campbell S. Prenatal measurement of the fetal cerebellum and cisterna cerebellomedullaris by ultrasound. Prenat Diagn. 1986;6(2):133-41.

Guan B. Surveillance of fetal growth and fetal cerebellar transverse diameter by ultrasonographic measurement. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1992;72(2):65-7.