DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20172088

Comparative study of CURB-65, Pneumonia Severity Index and IDSA/ATS scoring systems in community acquired pneumonia in an Indian tertiary care setting

S. Madhu, Sabu Augustine, Y. S. Ravi Kumar, Kauser Kauser M. M., S. R. Vagesh Kumar, B. S. Jayaraju

Abstract


Background: Few comparative studies regarding prognostic scoring systems for community acquired pneumonia (CAP) are available from Indian context.

Methods: Hospital-based prospective study to test the comparison between confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age over 65 years (CURB-65), Pneumonia severity index (PSI) and infectious diseases society of America/American thoracic society criteria (IDSA/ATS) scoring systems in patients with community acquired pneumonia.

Results: CURB-65 class ≥III, PSI class ≥IV and patients who needed admission to intensive care unit (ICU) based on IDSA/ATS criteria were having sensitivity of 41.7%, 91.7% and 87.5% in predicting ICU admission with a specificity of 89.5%, 59.2% and 73.7% respectively. Their sensitivity in predicting death were 44.4%, 88.9% and 83.3% with a specificity of 87.8%, 54.9% and 68.3% respectively. In both PSI score and IDSA/ATS criteria risk scoring systems, mortality rate, need for ICU admission increased progressively with increasing scores but CURB-65 score did not show this correlation. The PSI class ≥IV was more sensitive in predicting ICU admission than CURB-65 and IDSA/ATS criteria.

Conclusions: PSI was most sensitive in both predicting ICU admission and death whereas CURB-65 is most specific in predicting ICU admission and death. But CURB-65 is least sensitive in both predicting ICU admission and death. Even though IDSA/ATS criteria did not have highest sensitivity and specificity as single criteria it had modest sensitivity and specificity in predicting ICU admission and death.


Keywords


Community acquired pneumonia, CURB-65, IDSA/ATS criteria, Pneumonia severity index

Full Text:

PDF

References


Regional situation on health statistics reporting. Health Situation in the South-East Asia Region 1994-1997. New Delhi: EHI/WHO-SEARO; 2007.

Fishman AP. Acute bronchitis and community-acquired pneumonia; Fishman’s Pulmonary Diseases and Disorders; Fourth Edition; USA McGraw-Hill; 2008:2097-2114.

Lieberman D, Schalaeffer F, Boldur I, Liebermam D, Horowitz, Friedman MG, et al. Multiple pathogens in adult patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia: a one year prospective study of 346 consecutive patients. Thorax. 1996;51:179-84.

Woodhead MA, Welch CA, Harrison DA, Bellingan G, Ayres JG. Community-acquired pneumonia on the intensive care unit: secondary analysis of 17,869 cases in the ICNARC case mix programme data base. Crit Care. 2006;10:S1.

Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA. Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1996;275:134-41.

Torres A, Serra-Batlles J, Ferrer A. Severe community-acquired pneumonia: Epidemiology and prognostic factors. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:312-8.

British Thoracic Society: Guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults admitted to hospital. Br J Hosp Med. 1993;49:346-50.

Mohanty S, Babu VH. comparative study of newer prognostic scoring systems in predicting severity in community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients. IOSR-JDMS. 2016;15(6):146-52.

Bansal S, Kashyap S, Pal LS, Goel A. Clinical and bacteriological profile of community acquired pneumonia in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2004;46:17-22.

Dey AB, Nagarkar KM, Kumar V. Clinical presentation and predictors of outcome in adult patients with community acquired pneumonia. National Med J India. 1997;10:4.

Lim WS, Lewis S, Macfarlane JT. Severity prediction rules in community-acquired pneumonia: a validation study. Thorax. 2000;55:219-23.

Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:243-50.

Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society: Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:S27.

Aydogdu M, Ozyilmaz E, Aksoy H, Gursel G, Ekim N. Mortality prediction in community - acquired pneumonia requiring maechnical ventilation; values of pneumonia and intensive care unit severity scores. Tuberkuloz ve Toraks Dergisi. 2010;58:25-34.

Shah BA, Ahmed W, Dhobi GN, Shah NN, Khursheed SQ, Haq I. Validity of pneumonia severity index and curb 65 severity scoring systems in community acquired pneumonia in indian setting; Indian J Chest Dis Alli Sci. 2010;52:9-17.

Alavi-Moghaddam M, Bakhshi H, Rezaei B, Khashayar P. Pneumonia severity index compared to CURB-65 in predicting the outcome of community acquired pneumonia among patients referred to an Iranian emergency department: a prospective survey. Bra Infect Dis. 2013;17(2):179-83.

Safwat AM, Eldaboosy, Halima KM, Shaarawy AT, Kanany HM, Elgamal EM, et al. Comparison between CURB-65, PSI, and SIPF scores as predictors of ICU admission and mortality in community-acquired pneumonia. Egyptian J Criti Care Med. 2015;3:37-44.