Published: 2017-01-23

Low tesla MRI in acute spinal injuries: a study in a teaching hospital

Raghunath Anant Nagvekar, Pooja Nagvekar


Background: Early detection of spinal cord lesions in patients of suspected acute spinal injury leads to better prognosis. MRI has become a standard technique for evaluating spinal injuries and especially helpful for diagnosing acute compression of the spinal cord and cord oedema. This study was conducted to evaluate the low tesla MRI findings in cases of suspected acute spinal injuries.

Methods: 120 patients with a suspected history of spinal injury who came into the emergency ward of our hospital were included into the study. MRI was done for all the patients within 2 days of admission.

Results: The most common age group to be affected was 21-40 years with 48%followed by 41-60 years with 34% being affected. 46% of the patients had cervical injuries, 24% had dorsolumbar and lumbar injuries were seen in 17% of the patients. Spinal cord injuries was seen in 73 of the patients, out of which 64 patients had cord edema,7 with cord haemorrhage and 2 had cord transection.

Conclusions: 0.3T MRI was able to identify cord compression and swelling, traumatic disc herniation’s, epidural hematoma, soft tissue injuries, and prevertebral/paravertebral hematoma, while MR imaging was unsatisfactory in identifying small fractures especially of posterior elements.


Low tesla MRI, Spinal cord injury, Trauma

Full Text:



Kerslake, Worthington. MRI of spinal trauma. BJR. 1991;64(761);386-402.

Khandelwal, Sharma GL, Saxena UD, Sakhi P, Gopal S, Saxena P. Prospective evaluation of spine injuries by MRI and assessing role of MR findings in predicting prognosis. Neuroradiology. 2004;14:71-80.

Berg MEL, Castellote JM, Mahillo-Fernandez I, Pedro-Cuesta J. Incidence of spinal cord injury Worldwide: a systematic review. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;34:184-92.

Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Matsuno Y, Kojima R, Sakamoto Y, Oguni T, et al. Acute spinal cord injury: magnetic resonance imaging correlated with myelopathy. Br J Radiol. 1991;64(759):201-9.

Benedetti P, Fahr L, Kuhns L, Hayman LA. MR imaging findings in spinal ligamentous injury. AJR. 2000;175:661-5.

Potter K, Saifuddin A. MRI of chronic spinal cord injury. British J Radiol. 2003;76:347-52.

Moubon. Effect of field strength on MR images: comparison in 0.5T, 1T and 1.5T, Radio Graphics. 1999;19:1057-67.

Rahman L. Management of spinal injury: experience in Rajshahi Medical College Hospital. J Teac Asso RMC, Rajshahi. 2002;15:25-7.

Lenehan B. Demographics of acute admissions to a National Spinal Injuries Unit. Euro Spine J. 2009;18:938-42.

Wyndaele M, Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord. 2006;44:523-9.

Gupta N, Raja K. Demographic characteristics of individuals with paraplegia in India- a survey. Indian J Physio Occupat Ther. 2009;2.

Flanders AE, Schaefer DM, Doan HT, Mishkin MM, Gonzalez CF, Northrup BE. Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology. 1990;177:25-33.

Bensch F, Koivikko MP, Kiuru MJ, Koskinen SK. The incidence and distribution of burst fractures. Emergency Radiol. 2006;12:124-9.