DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20173232

Correlation of subjective and objective measurement of physical activity in young adult and assessment of general awareness of type 2 Diabetes mellitus in Pune urban population

Shubhadarshini Pawar, Pawar Priyadarshani G., Jayashree S. Kharche, Pranita Ashok

Abstract


Background: Measurement of physical activity is a challenging and complex procedure. Objective assessment of physical activity can help to overcome errors incurred by subjective methods like PAQs. Hence, this study was planned to compare measurement of physical activity subjectively using IPAQ and objectively using pedometer in young adults.

Methods: Young adults in the age group of 18-22 years were included in the study. Detailed history of physical activity was taken using IPAQ (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) for subjective measurement of physical activity. Participant’s physical activity was measured with the help of pedometer for objective assessment of physical activity.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in measurement of physical activity by subjective and objective methods. IPAQ overestimates physical activity.

Conclusions: In this study, there was no statistically significant difference in subjective and objective methods of physical activity assessment. Study concludes subjective method overestimates physical activity than objective method.


Keywords


IPAQ, Physical activity, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Full Text:

PDF

References


World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

Wareham NJ, Rennie KL. The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: Why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? Int J Obes. 1998;22:S30-S38.

Jobe JB, Mingay DJ: Cognitive research improves questionnaires. Am J Pub Health. 1989;79:1053-5.

Durante R, Ainsworth BE: The recall of physical activity: using a cognitive model of the question-answering process. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;28:1282-91.

Brown W, Bauman A, Chey T, Trost S, Mummery K. Comparison of surveys used to measure physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2004;28:128-34.

WHA. World Health Assembly 57.17. Global Strategy on diet, physical activity and health; 2004.

Ekelund U, Sepp H, Brage S, Becker W, Jakes R, Hennings M, et al. Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the international physical activity questionnaire in Swedish adults. Pub Health Nutrition. 2006;2:258-65.

Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR. How many steps/day are enough?. Sports medicine. 2004;34(1):1-8.

Paul Innerd, Michael Catt, Joanna Collerton, Karen Davies, Michael Trenell, Thomas BL Kirkwood, et al. A comparison of subjective and objective measures of physical activity from the Newcastle 85+ study. Age Ageing. 2015;44(4):691-4.

Maria Hagstromer, Barbara E Ainsworth, Pekka Oja, Michael Sjostrom. Comparison of a Subjective and an Objective Measure of Physical Activity in a Population Sample. J Physical Act and Health. 2010;7:541-50.

LeBlanc AG, Janssen I. Difference between self-reported and accelerometer measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in youth. Ped Ex Sci. 2010;22(4):523-34.

Jayshree S Kharche, Pranita Ashok, Robin G Raju and B Balsubramanian. Gender difference in MET score and waist to hip ratio in young adults. Int J Biomed Adv Res. 2014;05(07):343-5.