DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20180071

The advantage of PCR for MTB in comparison to ADA in diagnosing tubercular pleural effusion

Abhishek Agarwal, Ahbab Hussain, Rajendra Prasad, Anand Verma, Amitabh Banka, Tasleem Raza

Abstract


Background: Tuberculosis continues to be an important health problem globally. The bacteriological confirmation of diagnosis in extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients is more difficult because most of the cases of extrapulmonary tuberculosis are paucibacillary in nature. In this study we have compared the pleural fluid ADA levels with PCR for MTB in pleural fluid to confirm the diagnosis of tuberculosis in the pleural fluid.

Methods: The study was done over two years and a total of 106 patients with a clinico-radiological diagnosis of pleural effusion were enrolled for the study. The pleural fluid was aspirated and examined for total cell count, differential cell count, protein, sugar, ADA and PCR for MTB.A CT Thorax was done in all the 106 patients of pleural effusion and underlying consolidation along with pleural effusion was found in 60 patients.

Results: The pleural fluid was exudative in nature in all the patients. 90 patients (84.9%) had lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion while 16 patients (15.1%) had neutrophil predominant pleural effusion. The overall sensitivity of ADA in all the cases of pleural effusion was 85.2% while the overall sensitivity of PCR for MTB in all the cases of pleural effusion was 51.1%. However, in the 60 patients of pleural effusion with underlying lung consolidation, the overall sensitivity of ADA was 69.1% while the overall sensitivity of PCR for MTB was 92.8% for diagnosing tubercular pleural effusion.

Conclusions: PCR for MTB is a useful test along with ADA for diagnosing tubercular pleural effusion. PCR for MTB is especially useful in the diagnosis of tubercular pleural effusion in patients with underlying lung consolidation.

 


Keywords


ADA, PCR for MTB, Pleural effusion, Tuberculosis

Full Text:

PDF

References


World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis report 2016, 2016. Available at http://www.searo.who.int/tb/documents/global-tuberculosis-report-2016/en/.

World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis report 2015, 2015. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/191102/1/9789241565059_eng.pdf.

Central TB division. TB India 2017. Revised national tuberculosis control programme. Annual status report. Directorate general of health services, New Delhi. Available at https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807.

Sharma SK, Mohan A. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2004;120(4):316-53.

Prakasha SR, Suresh G, D’sa IP, Shetty SS, Kumar SG. Mapping the pattern and trends of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. J Glob Infect Dis. 2013;5(2):54-59.

Porcel JM, Light RW. Diagnostic approach to pleural effusion in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2006;73(7):1211-20.

Chottiner EG, Cloft HJ, Tartaglia AP, Mitchell BS. Elevated adenosine deaminase activity and hereditary hemolytic anemia. Evidence for abnormal translational control of protein synthesis. J Clin Invest. 1987;79(3):1001-5.

Cowan MJ, Brady RO, Widder KJ. Elevated erythrocyte adenosine deaminase activity in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83(4):1089-91.

Mazzola E, Arosio M, Nava A, Fanti D, Gesu G, Farina C. Performance of real-time PCR Xpert MTB/RIF in diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Infez Med. 2016;24(4):304-9.

Porcel JM. Advances in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(15):282-8.

Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Behera D, Agarwal R. Diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in tuberculous pleural effusion: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(4):1133-6.

Rufai SB, Singh S, Singh A, Kumar P, Singh J, Vishal A. Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF on Ascitic fluid samples for detection of Abdominal Tuberculosis. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9(1):47-52.

Lekhak SP, Sharma L, Rajbhandari R, Rajbhandari P, Shrestha R, Pant B. Evaluation of multiplex PCR using MPB64 and IS6110 primers for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2016;100:1-4.

Porcel JM. Tuberculous pleural effusion. Lung. 2009;187(5):263-70.

Light RW. Update on tuberculous pleural effusion. Respirology. 2010;15(3):451-8.

Villegas MV, Labrada LA, Saravia NG. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction, adenosine deaminase and interferon-gamma in pleural fluid for the differential diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis. CHEST. 2000;118(5):1355-64.

Zaric B, Kuruc V, Milovancev A, Markovic M, Sarcev T, Canak V, Pavlovic S. Differential diagnosis of tuberculous and malignant pleural effusions: what is the role of adenosine deaminase? Lung. 2008;186(4):233-40.

Vorster MJ, Allwood BW, Diacon AH, Koegelenberg CFN. Tuberculous pleural effusions: advances and controversies. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(6):981-91.

Kumar S, Agarwal R, Bal A, Sharma K, Singh N, Aggarwal AN, et al. Utility of adenosine deaminase(ADA), PCR and thoracoscopy in differentiating tuberculous and non-tuberculous pleural effusion complicating chronic kidney disease. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141(3):308-14.

Rosso F, Michelon CT, Sperhacke RD, Verza M, Olival L, Conde MB, et al. Evaluation of real-time PCR of patient pleural effusion for diagnosis of tuberculosis. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:279-84.

Du J, Huang Z, Luo Q, Xiong G, Xu X, Li W, et al. Rapid diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis by Xpert MTB/RIF assay using pleural biopsy and pleural fluid specimens. J Res Med Sci. 2015;20(1):26-31.

Chakravorty S, Sen MK, Tyagi JS. Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis using smear, culture and PCR using universal sample processing technology. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4357-62.