Diagnosis of dengue fever: roles of different laboratory test methods

Authors

  • Abhra Banerjee Department of Microbiology, R. G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
  • Uttam Kumar Paul Department of Medicine, MGM Medical College, Kishanganj, Bihar, India
  • Arup Bandyopadhyay Department of Physiology, MGM Medical College, Kishanganj, Bihar, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20181076

Keywords:

Comparison of lab tests in dengue, Diagnosis of dengue, NS1 antigen

Abstract

Background: Dengue fever is currently the most important arthropod borne viral disease. Since occurrence of dengue infections has been an epidemic in many parts of India and complications like DHF and DSS are increasing, while at the same time the diagnosis is challenging, particularly the laboratory diagnosis is confusing, this study was conducted to evaluate the different laboratory test methods and to compare their respective efficacy, timing, advantages and disadvantages.

Methods: This study was done in the Department of Microbiology in collaboration with the Department of Medicine and Pediatrics in two tertiary care medical colleges and hospitals in eastern India. Blood samples from 319 patients with clinical features suggestive of Dengue fever were included in this study. Laboratory investigations were done which included immunological assays that were performed using commercially available kits - SD dengue duo NS1Ag + Ab combo rapid test, NS1 Ag capture ELISA, IgM capture ELISA, IgG capture ELISA test for dengue and other routine tests -full blood cell count, coagulation tests, routine biochemical and lipid profile were also done. Ethical considerations were taken care of and statistical evaluations were done.

Results: An increased detection of IgM antibody (46.15%) was seen in the early febrile period (1-5 days) as compared to the mid-febrile period (6-10 days), and late febrile period (6-10 days) when it is 6.89%. IgG antibody is much less in early febrile period (4.16%). Compared to mid-febrile period (24.13%), and late febrile period (62.5%). IgM antibodies were detected in 44.5% of the samples, IgG antibodies were detected in 43.5% of the samples, Rapid test was positive in 36.9% and NS1AG ELISA was detected in 43.5% of the samples in the study.

Conclusions: It can be inferred from our study that for detection of dengue in the early febrile period (1-5 days), estimation of dengue-specific serum IgM is the most sensitive antibody detection method.

References

Wichmann O, Hongsiriwon S, Bowonwatanuwong C, Chotivanich K, Sukthana Y, Pukrittayakamee S. Risk factors and clinical features associated with severe dengue infection in adults and children during the 2001 epidemic in Chonburi, Thailand. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2004 Sep 1;9(9):1022-9.

Singh B. Dengue outbreak in 2006: Failure of public health system?. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2007 Apr 1;32(2):99.

Chaturvedi UC, R Shrivastava. Dengue Haemonhagic fever: Aglobal challenge. IJMM. 2004;22(1):5-6.

Yamashiro T, Disla M, Petit A, Taveras D, Castro-Bello M, Lora-Orste M, et al. Seroprevalence of IgG specific for dengue virus among adults and children in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2004 Aug 1;71(2):138-43.

Topley WWC, Wilson SGS. Topley and Wilson Microbiology and Microbial infections, 10th Edition. 2006;993-1009.

Ahluwalia G, Sharma SK. Dengue: Current trends and challenges: An Indian perspective. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004; 52:561-5.

Kumar A, Pandit VR, Shetty S, Puttanshetty S, Krish SN, Roy S. A Profile of dengue cases admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karnataka Southern India. Trop Doct. 2010 Jan; 40(1):45-6.

Kurukumbi M, Wali JP, Shoba Baroor, Aggarwal P, Seth P, Rohini Harda, et al. Seroepidemiology and active surveillance of Dengue fever/Dengue haemorrhagic fever in Delhi. Indian J Med Sci. 2001;55:149-56.

Neeraja M, Lakshmi V, Teja VD. Serodiagnosis of dengue virus infection in patients presenting to a Tertiary Care Hospital. Indian J. Med Microbiol. 2006:24(4):280-2.

Guzman MG, and Kouri G. Advances in Dengue diagnosis. Clin Diagn. Lab Imunol. 1996;3:621-7.

Lam SK, Chew CB, Poon GK, Ramalingam S, Seow SC, Pang T. Isolation of dengue viruses by intracerebral inoculation of mosquito larvae. Journal of virological methods. 1986 Sep 1;14(2):133-40.

Rosen L, Gubler D. The use of mosquitoes to detect and propagate dengue viruses. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1974 Nov 1;23(6):1153-60.

Gubler DJ, Rosen L. A simple technique for demonstrating transmission of Dengue virus by mosquitoes without the use of vertebrate hosts. AM J Trop Med. 1976;25:146-50.

Win T. Detection of Dengue viruses by immuno fluorescence of the intra cerebral inoculation of mosquitoes Lancet. 1982;67:57-64.

Richman DD, Whitley RJ, Fvederick G. Hayden: Text book of clinical virology, 2nd Edition, Flaviviruses and viral Hemorrhagic fevers a comparative appraisal. 135-144, 1097-1150.

Shu PY, Huang JH. Current advances in dengue diagnosis. Clinical and Diagnostic laboratory immunology. 2004 Jul 1;11(4):642-50.

Libraty DH, Acosta LP, Tallo V, Segubre-Mercado E, Bautista A, Potts JA, et al. High circulating levels of Dengue virus nonstructural protein NS1 early in Dengue illness correlate with the development of Dengue hemorrhagic Fever. J Infect Dis. 2002;186(8):1165-8.

Clarke DH, Casals J. Techniques for haemagglutination and haemagglutination -inhibition with Arthropod borne virus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine, Hygiene. 1958;7:561-73.

Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Alice S, weissfeld Bailey and Scotts diagnostic microbiology. 12th Edition. 2007;120-146.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-21

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles