D-dimer negative pulmonary embolism


  • Dhananjaya M. Department of Medicine, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
  • Kirankumar Meti Department of Medicine, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
  • Rajendrakumar Parakh Department of Medicine, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India




CT pulmonary angiography, D-dimer, Pre-test probability, Pulmonary embolus, Venous thromboembolism


Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE), is one of the major cardiovascular causes of death. Pulmonary embolus (PE) can be fatal but is often treatable if recognized early. Unfortunately, the clinical presentation of PE is often variable and misleading mimicking other illnesses and hence known as "the Great Masquerader," making diagnosis difficult. The D-dimer assay has recently come into favour as a method to exclude PE; however, this test has an acceptable safety margin only in low-risk populations.

Methods: Present study included 35 patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism admitted at the tertiary care hospital of North Karnataka during the period from October 2016 to September 2017. Patients were classified according to final diagnosis by CT Pulmonary Angiography into 28 cases positive for PE (80%) and 7 cases negative for PE (20%).

Results: Present study included 35 cases suspected to have PE (26 males and 9 females). Their age ranged from 33 to 72 years, with a mean age 48.9 ±14.2 years. 28 cases positive for PE (80%) and 7 cases negative for PE (20%). The mean age of positive and negative PE cases was 48.1±11.2 and 46.4±8.8 respectively. Results of D-dimer test were positive in 10 cases (35.7%) and were negative in 18 cases (61.3 %) of PE.

Conclusions: This report highlights the risk of misdiagnosing PE if relying solely on ELISA D-dimer for exclusion. This report documents the presentation of PE despite having unremarkable ELISA D-dimer measurements and highlights the importance of clinical suspicion.


Sandler DA, Martin JF. Autopsy proven pulmonary embolism in hospital patients: are we detecting enough deep vein thrombosis? J R Soc Med. 1989;82:203-5.

Lindblad B, Sternby NH, Bergqvist D. Incidence of venous thromboembolism verified by necropsy over 30 years. BMJ. 1991;302:709-11.

Alikhan R, Peters F, Wilmott R, Cohen AT. Fatal pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients: a necropsy review. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:1254-7.

Anderson FA Jr, Zayaruzny M, Heit JA, Fidan D, Cohen AT. Estimated annual numbers of US acute-care hospital patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Am J Hematol. 2007;82:777-82.

Anderson FA Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B E. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:933-8.

Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ. 3rd. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:585-93.

Spencer FA, Emery C, Lessard D, Anderson F, Emani S, Aragam J, Becker RC, Goldberg RJ. The Worcester Venous Thromboembolism study: a population-based study of the clinical epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:722-7.

Pineda LA, Hathwar VS, Grant BJ. Clinical suspicion of fatal pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2001;120:791-5.

P. Florence, M. Sophie, M. Guy, et al, Diagnostic value of D dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: results from a multicentre outcome study. Thromb Res. 2007;120:195-200.

A. Perrier, P. Roy, D. Aujesky, Aujesky D, Chagnon I, Howarth N, Gourdier AL, Leftheriotis G. et al, Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med. 2004,116:291-9.

P. Stein, R. Hull, K. Patel, et al, D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review, Ann. Intern. Med. 2004;140:589-602.

T. Adam, P. Arnaud, K. Stavros, et al, Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism, Eur. Heart J. 2008;29:2276-15.

C. Kearon, Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Can Med Assoc. 2003;168:183-194.

S. Siragusa, Plasma D-dimer test accuracy can be affected by heparin administration. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:246.

T. Rajan, K. Rajesh, J. Kevin, et al, D-Dimers and efficacy of clinical risk estimation algorithms: sensitivity in evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009;193:425-30.






Original Research Articles